Protocol for a mixed methods exploratory study of success factors to escalation of care: the SUFFICE study
Ede, J.; Watkinson, P.; Endacott, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundIn the United Kingdom, hospital patients suffer preventable deaths (failure to rescue) and delayed admission to the Intensive Care Unit because of poor illness recognition. This problem has consistently been identified in care reviews. Strategies to improve deteriorating ward patient care, such as early warning systems and specialist care teams (Critical Care Outreach or Rapid Response), have not reliably demonstrated reductions to patient deaths. Current research focuses on failure to rescue, but further reductions to patient deaths are possible, by examining care of unwell hospital patients who are rescued (successfully treated). Our primary objective is to develop a framework of care escalation success factors that can be developed into a complex intervention to reduce patient mortality and unnecessary admissions to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Methods and AnalysisSUFFICE is a multicentre mixed-methods, exploratory sequential study examining rescue events in the acutely unwell ward patient in two National Health Service Trusts with Teaching Hospital status. The study will constitute four key phases. Firstly, we will observe ward care escalation events to generate a theoretical understanding of the process of rescue. Secondly, we will review care records from unwell ward patients in whom an ICU admission was avoided to identify care success factors. Thirdly, we will conduct staff interviews with expert doctors, nurses, and Allied Health Professionals to identify how rescue is achieved and further explore care escalation success factors identified in the first two study phases. The final phase involves integrating the study data to generate the theoretical basis for the framework of care escalation success factors. Ethics and DisseminationEthical approval has been obtained through the Queen Square London Research and Ethics committee (REC Ref 20/HRA/3828; CAG-20CAG0106). Study results will be of interest to critical care, nursing and medical professions and results will be disseminated at national and international conferences. Trial Registration NumberISRCTN 38850
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 95%
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences, and stakeholder engagement protocol 95%
- The Impact on Staff of Providing Non-Invasive Advanced Respiratory Support During the Covid-19 Pandemic A Qualitative Study in an Acute Hospital 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for a scoping review investigating success in research capacity building for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals 95%
- A mixed-methods multi-site case study of a person-centred intervention for constant observation in hospitals with people living with dementia 94%
- Determinants of regulatory compliance in health and social care services: a systematic review using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Electronic early notification of sepsis in hospitalized ward patients: a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 94%
- Decision support system to evaluate VENTilation in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (DeVENT study) – Trial Protocol 92%
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Electronic Early Notification of Sepsis in Hospitalized Ward Patients (SCREEN): a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Health Navigator intervention to address the unmet social needs of caregivers of hospitalised children in South Australia: protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study 95%
- The MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MyComrade) study: A protocol for a cross-border pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 93%
- A complex ePrescribing-based Anti-Microbial Stewardship (ePAMS+) intervention for hospitals combining technological and behavioural components: protocol for a feasibility trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 93%
- An observational study of survival outcomes of people referred for ‘fast-track’ end-of-life care funding in a District General Hospital; too little too late? 93%
- Improving the impact of pharmacy interventions in hospitals 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.