Back

Plasticity in stomatal behavior across a gradient of water supply is consistent among field-grown maize inbred lines with varying stomatal patterning

Ding, R.; Xie, J.; Mayfield-Jones, D.; Zhang, Y.; Kang, S.; Leakey, A.

2021-10-29 plant biology
10.1101/2021.10.28.466255 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Stomata regulate leaf CO2 assimilation (A) and water loss. The Ball-Berry and Medlyn models predict stomatal conductance (gs) with a slope parameter (m or g1) that reflects sensitivity of gs to A, atmospheric CO2 and humidity, and is inversely related to water use efficiency (WUE). This study addressed knowledge gaps about what the values of m and g1 are in C4 crops under field conditions, as well as how they vary among genotypes and with drought stress. m and g1 were unexpectedly consistent in four inbred maize genotypes across a gradient of water supply. This was despite genotypic variation in stomatal patterning, A and gs. m and g1 were strongly correlated with soil water content, moderately correlated with pre-dawn leaf water potential ({Psi}pd), and weakly correlated with midday leaf water potential ({Psi}md). This implied that m and g1 respond to long-term water supply more than short-term drought stress. The conserved nature of m and g1 across anatomically diverse genotypes and water supplies suggests there is flexibility in structure-function relationships underpinning WUE. This evidence can guide simulation of maize gs across a range of water supply in the primary maize growing region and inform efforts to improve WUE. Summary statementParameter values for models simulating stomatal conductance were unexpectedly consistent for anatomically and physiologically diverse genotypes of the model C4 crop maize when they were grown across a range of water supplies in the field.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.