Back

Fitting Of Hyperelastic Constitutive Models In Different Sheep Heart Regions Based On Biaxial Mechanical Properties

Nemavhola, F.; Pandelani, T.; Ngwangwa, H.

2021-10-29 bioengineering
10.1101/2021.10.28.466240 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Heart failure remains one of the leading causes of death especially among people over the age of 60 years worldwide. To develop effective therapy and suitable replacement materials for the heart muscle it is necessary to understand its biomechanical behaviour under load. This paper investigates the passive mechanical response of the sheep myocardia excised from three different regions of the heart. Due to the relatively higher cost and huge ethical demands in acquisition and testing of real animal heart models, this paper evaluates the fitting performances of five different constitutive models on the myocardial tissue responses. Ten sheep were sacrificed, and their hearts excised and transported within 3h to the testing biomechanical laboratory. The upper sections of the hearts above the short axes were carefully dissected out. Tissues were dissected from the mid-sections of the left ventricle, mid-wall and right ventricle for each heart. The epicardia and endocardia were then carefully sliced off each tissue to leave the myocardia. Stress-strain curves were calculated, filtered and resampled. The results show that Choi-Vito model was found to provide the best fit to the LV, the polynomial (Anisotropic) model to RV, the Four-Fiber Family model to RV, Holzapfel (2000) to RV, Holzapfel (2005) to RV and the Fung model to LV.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
4
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
6
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
7
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
9
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
10
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
12
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
14
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
15
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
17
Journal of Mathematical Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.5%