Back

Application of Cas12j for Streptomyces editing and cluster activation

Tan, L. L.; Heng, E.; Zulkarnain, N.; Leong, C. Y.; Ng, V.; Yang, L. K.; Seow, D. C. S.; Peh, G.; Lim, Y. H.; Lokanand, K.; Kanagasundaram, Y.; Ng, S. B.; Wong, F. T.

2021-10-29 microbiology
10.1101/2021.10.28.465406 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In recent years, CRISPR-Cas toolboxes for Streptomyces editing have rapidly accelerated natural product discovery and engineering. However, Cas efficiencies are also oftentimes strain dependent, subsequently a variety of Cas proteins would allow for flexibility and enable genetic manipulation within a wider range of Streptomyces strains. In this work, we have further expanded the Cas toolbox by presenting the first example of Cas12j mediated editing in Streptomyces sp. A34053. In our study, we have also observed significantly improved editing efficiencies with Acidaminococcus sp. Cas12j compared to Cas12a, Francisella tularensis subsp. novicida U112s type V-A Cas (FnCpf1).

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.5%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Microbial Cell Factories
○ 27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Microorganisms
○ 106 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
Similar papers in this journal
4
BMC Research Notes
○ 33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.1%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Frontiers in Microbiology
○ 427 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.3%
7
Access Microbiology
● 25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
8
Biochimie
○ 25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
9
Molecules
○ 39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
10
BMC Microbiology
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
50% of probability mass above
11
Biotechnology for Biofuels
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
○ 494 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
13
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
○ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
14
mSphere
● 302 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
15
Journal of Biotechnology
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
16
Microbiology Spectrum
● 469 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.5%
17
Metabolic Engineering Communications
○ 22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
18
MicrobiologyOpen
○ 24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
Biomedicines
○ 67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
The CRISPR Journal
○ 39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
21
Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
22
FEBS Letters
○ 47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
23
Methods
○ 34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
24
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
○ 98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
25
ACS Synthetic Biology
● 287 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
26
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
● 339 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
27
Current Microbiology
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
28
Open Biology
● 106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
29
BMC Biotechnology
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
30
Microbiology
● 65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.