Social discrimination and stigma on the community of health professionals during the Covid-19 pandemic. An ethnographic approach
Argyriadis, A.; Patelarou, A.; Kitsona, V.; Trivli, A.; Patelarou, E.; Argyriadi, A.
Show abstract
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that caused the pandemic since March 2020, has affected among others, health professionals who work in covid-19 units by facing social discrimination. The aim of this study was to record the experiences of health professionals working in the first line of treatment of the pandemic, to analyse the effects of the pandemic on the interpersonal relationships of health professionals, and to ask about the stigma they faced during their work with people with covid-19. This is a qualitative study with an ethnographic approach based on 160 semi-structured interviews with health professionals living and working in the Epirus Region, Greece. For the data collection we used semi-structured interviews, discussions and participatory observation. Specifically, the interviews were conducted on health professionals and more specifically doctors, nurses, rescuers, physiotherapists and administrative staff, working in covid-19 units at the University General Hospital of Ioannina (Reference hospital for Ioannina, in Epirus), which assists in the treatment of patients with covid-19, and in the branch of the rescue department of Ioannina. The data were analysed in four thematic units based on their common characteristics: a) emotions and experiences of health professionals, b) interpersonal relations of health professionals, c) social exclusion and discrimination, and d) health professionals as patients. The results showed that the main emotions that health professionals experienced when they were moved to covid-19 clinics were fear, anxiety, distress, anger and insecurity. These feelings worsened when their family environment treated them with fear and hesitancy. Their social environment tended to avoid them, leading to a state of self-isolation. To conclude, health professionals faced discriminating behaviors and stigma both from their families and social environment, and from other health professionals. The government struggled to handle the situation in keeping a balance between both the security and well-being of health professionals as it was not prepared for a pandemic like this.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethical and psychosocial considerations for hospital personnel in the Covid-19 crisis: Moral injury and resilience 97%
- The impact of COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions on the lived experiences of people living in Thailand, Malaysia, Italy and the United Kingdom: a cross-country qualitative study 96%
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental health challenges and the associated factors in HIV-positive women who have children living with HIV in Indonesia: A qualitative study 95%
- The experience of distress during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-country examination on the fear of COVID-19 and the sense of loneliness 94%
- Experience of the COVID-19 pandemic in rural Odisha, India: knowledge, preventative actions, and impacts on daily life 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transnational adoptees in healthcare: barriers, resources, and needs 95%
- Anxiety, depression, and insomnia among nurses during the full liberalization of COVID-19: A multicenter cross-sectional analysis of the high-income region in China 94%
- COVID-19 critical care simulations: An international cross-sectional survey 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 97%
- Occupational challenges of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative study 97%
- Psychosocial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic: Identification of most vulnerable populations 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-health Management and Role of Nurses of Diabetic Patients: A systematic review during COVID-19 Pandemic 90%
- Prevalence of Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 following natural infection and vaccination in Irish Hospital Healthcare Workers; changing epidemiology as the pandemic progresses 89%
- Disruption of Normal Saline Supply Chain due to Natural Disaster: an analysis of the impact of normal saline shortage on anesthesia practice in a large hospital system and models towards resiliency 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.