Back

Temperature predicts leaf shape in palms (Arecaceae)

Jimenez, M. F. T.; Chazot, N.; Emilio, T.; Fredin, J. U.; Antonelli, A.; Faurby, S.; Bacon, C. D.

2021-10-28 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2021.10.26.465896 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AimLeaves display a remarkable variety of shapes, each with potential ecological advantages in specific climates. While relations between leaf shape and either climate or height has been relatively well studied in eudicots, the macroecological drivers of shape remain poorly known in monocots. Here, we investigated associations between climate and plant height with the evolution of leaf shape in a clade with high species and morphological diversity. LocationGlobal. Time periodCretaceous to contemporary. Major taxa studiedPalms (Arecaceae). MethodsWe apply a Bayesian phylogenetic mixed model to test for associations between climate and leaf shape (all entire-leaved, pinnate-dissected, palmate-dissected, and costapalmate). We further reconstruct the ancestral leaf shape using multistate speciation and extinction models and compare the frequency of shapes with global temperatures through time. ResultsWe find that plant height associates with dissected leaves and that annual precipitation associates with pinnate shapes. The ancestral leaf shape is unclear but early diversification was dominated by pinnate-dissected palms, which has remained the most species-rich form of leaves throughout palm history. Main conclusionsPalms that are tall and live in humid regions are more likely to have pinnate leaves. Through geological time scales, temperature did not play an obvious role in determining leaf shapes. This study contributes to our understanding of how the diversity of leaf shapes is linked to biological and climatic factors.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.0%
2
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
3
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
4
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
8
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
10
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.9%
13
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
16
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
18
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
25
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.5%
28
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
30
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.5%