Phenotypic and genetic factors associated with differential consent to record linkage for prescription history in the Australian Genetics of Depression Study
Gomez, L.; Diaz Torres, S.; Colodro-Conde, L.; Garcia Marin, L.; Yap, C.; Byrne, E. M.; Yengo, L.; Lind, P. A.; Wray, N. R.; Medland, S.; Hickie, I.; Lupton, M.; Renteria, M. E.; Martin, N. G.; Campos, A. I.
Show abstract
Samples can be prone to ascertainment and attrition biases.The Australian Genetics of Depression Study is a large publicly recruited cohort (n=20,689) established to increase the understanding of depression and antidepressant treatment response. As part of the recruitment, participants donated a saliva sample and were given the option to consent to linkage of prescription records for research purposes. This study investigates differences between participants who donated a saliva sample or agreed to linkage of their records compared to those who did not. We observed that older, male participants with a higher education were more likely to donate a saliva sample. Self-reported bipolar disorder, ADHD, panic disorder, PTSD, substance use disorder and social anxiety disorder were associated with lower odds of donating a saliva sample whereas anorexia was associated with higher odds of donation. Male and younger participants showed higher odds of agreeing to record linkage. Participants with higher neuroticism scores and those with a history of bipolar disorder were also more likely to agree to record linkage whereas participants with a diagnosis of anorexia were less likely to agree. Increased likelihood of consent was also associated with increased genetic susceptibility to anorexia and reduced genetic risk for depression, and schizophrenia whereas there was no significant genetic effect for neuroticism. Overall, our results show moderate differences among these subsamples. Most current epidemiological studies do not adjust, nor search, for attrition biases at the genetic level. The possibility to do so is a strength of samples such as the AGDS. Our results suggest that analyses can be made more robust by identifying attrition biases both on the phenotypic and genetic level, and either contextualising them as a potential limitation or performing sensitivity analyses adjusting for them.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic overlap between psychotic experiences in the community across age and with psychiatric disorders 94%
- Blood epigenome-wide association studies of suicide attempt in adults with bipolar disorder 94%
- Acylcarnitines metabolism in depression: association with diagnostic status, depression severity and symptom profile in the NESDA cohort 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Examining sex differences in neurodevelopmental and psychiatric genetic risk in anxiety and depression 95%
- The UK Biobank Mental Health Enhancement 2022: Methods and Results 95%
- Influences of race and clinical variables on psychiatric genetic research participation: Results from a schizophrenia sample 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Polygenic risk scores for psychiatric, inflammatory, and cardio-metabolic traits and diseases highlight possible genetic overlaps with suicide attempt and treatment-emergent suicidal ideation 95%
- Rare protein coding variants implicate genes involved in risk of suicide death 93%
- "The Heidelberg Five" Personality Dimensions: Genome-wide Associations, Polygenic Risk for Neuroticism, and Psychopathology 20 Years after Assessment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the direct effects of the genetic liabilities to bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and behavioral traits on suicide attempt using a multivariable Mendelian randomization approach 95%
- Sensitive period-regulating genetic pathways and exposure to adversity shape risk for depression 93%
- Genetic overlap between mood instability and alcohol-related phenotypes suggests shared biological underpinnings 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.