Use of serology immunoassays for predicting SARS-CoV-2 infection: a serology-based diagnostic algorithm
Lazo-Langner, A.; Chin-Yee, B.; Tong, J.; Lowes, L.; Hedley, B. D.; Silverman, M.; Delport, J.; Bhayana, V.; Knauer, M.; Chin-Yee, I.
Show abstract
BackgroundDetection of viral RNA by nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) remains the gold standard for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection but is limited by high cost and other factors. Whether serology-based assays can be effectively incorporated into a diagnostic algorithm remains to be determined. Herein we describe the development of a serology-based testing algorithm for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients and MethodsBetween July 2020 and February 2021, we included symptomatic unvaccinated patients evaluated in the Emergency Department of our institution for suspected SARS-CoV-2. All patients had testing by real-time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction. The performance characteristics of five commercial enzymatic serology assays testing for different antibody isotypes were evaluated in a derivation cohort and the assay with the best performance was further tested on a validation cohort. Optimal cut-off points were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and further tested using logistic regression. ResultsThe derivation and validations cohorts included 72 and 319 patients, respectively. Based on its initial performance, the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay (Roche Diagnostics) was further tested in the validation cohort. Using ROC curve analysis, we estimated the diagnostic performance for different cut-off points assuming a prevalence of positive tests of 5%. At any given cut-off point the NPV was over 97%. DiscussionThis study suggests that an initial diagnostic strategy using the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 serology test in symptomatic unvaccinated patients could help to rule out an acute SARS-CoV2 infection and potentially lead to appropriately tailored infection control measures or rational guidance for further testing with a potential cost reduction and increased availability.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic accuracy of two commercial SARS-CoV-2 Antigen-detecting rapid tests at the point of care in community-based testing centers 96%
- Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Point of Care Devices in the Laboratory and Clinical Setting 96%
- Evaluation of a novel, rapid antigen detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A multicenter study to assess the performance of the point-of-care RT-PCR Cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B nucleic acid test for use on the Cobas Liat system in comparison with centralized assays across healthcare facilities in the United States 96%
- Performance characteristics of the VIDAS ® SARS-COV-2 IgM and IgG serological assays 96%
- Performance of three SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays, three rapid lateral flow tests and a novel bead-based affinity surrogate test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in human serum 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative study of four SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) platforms demonstrates that ID NOW performance is impaired substantially by patient and specimen type. 95%
- Diagnostic performance of multiplex lateral flow tests in ambulatory patients with acute respiratory illness 95%
- SARS-CoV-2 screening in patients in need of urgent inpatient treatment in the Emergency Department (ED) by digitally integrated point-of-care PCR: A clinical cohort study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-World Clinical Performance of the Abbott Panbio with Nasopharyngeal, Throat and Saliva Swabs Among Symptomatic Individuals with COVID-19 96%
- Automated Western immunoblotting detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 serum antibodies 94%
- The Unyvero Hospital-Acquired pneumonia panel for diagnosis of secondary bacterial pneumonia in COVID-19 patients 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.