Back

Structural Knowledge Transfer of Panoptic Kidney Segmentation to Other Stains, Organs, and Species

Ginley, B. G.; Jen, K.-Y.; Sarder, P.

2021-10-23 pathology
10.1101/2021.10.21.465370 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPanoptic segmentation networks are a newer class of image segmentation algorithms that are constrained to understand the difference between instance-type objects (objects that are discrete countable entities, such as renal tubules) and group-type objects (uncountable, amorphous regions of texture such as renal interstitium). This class of deep networks has unique advantages for biological datasets, particularly in computational pathology. MethodsWe collected 126 periodic acid Schiff whole slide images of native diabetic nephropathy, lupus nephritis, and transplant surveillance kidney biopsies, and fully annotated them for the following micro-compartments: interstitium, glomeruli, globally sclerotic glomeruli, tubules, and arterial tree (arteries/arterioles). Using this data, we trained a panoptic feature pyramid network. We compared performance of the network against a renal pathologists annotations, and the methods transferability to other computational pathology domain tasks was investigated. ResultsThe panoptic feature pyramid networks showed high performance as compared to renal pathologist for all of the annotated classes in a testing set of transplant kidney biopsies. The network was not only able to generalize its object understanding across different stains and species of kidney data, but also across several organ types. ConclusionsPanoptic networks have unique advantages for computational pathology; namely, these networks internally model structural morphology, which aids bootstrapping of annotations for new computational pathology tasks.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.4%
3
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.7%
5
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.7%
8
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
9
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
11
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
14
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.4%
15
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
17
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
21
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.7%
23
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
25
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.5%
28
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%