Survey evaluation of dog owners feeding habits in a household setting and comparison of FDA hygiene protocols on dog bowl bacterial contamination as evaluated by total aerobic cell counts.
Luisana, E.; Saker, K.; Jaykus, L.-A.; Getty, C.
Show abstract
In-home pet food handling and food dish hygiene practices can have adverse health impacts for both humans and pets. Safe food and dish handling guidelines are not easily evidenced for pet owners. The study was designed to investigate dog owners feeding habits and evaluate the impact of the Food and Drug Association (FDA) hygiene protocols on dog food dish contamination. Procedures and surveys were approved by NCSU-IACUC and -IRB. Pet feeding and food dish hygiene data were collected from 417 dog owner surveys and 68 food dish swabs. Total aerobic cell counts (TAC) were performed on 68 dishes and randomly assigned into Group A (FDA pet food handling and dish hygiene guidelines), Group B (FDA pet and human food handling and dish hygiene guidelines), or Group C (no guidelines). Hygiene protocols were instituted in-home for 1 week, followed by a second TAC and follow-up survey. Survey from dog owners-households indicated: 4.7% were aware of FDA pet food handling and dish hygiene guidelines; 36% have individuals [≤] 13 years old and/or immunocompromised; 43% store dog food 0-5 feet from human food; 34% wash their hands after feeding; and 33% prepare their dog food on human food preparation surfaces. The hygiene protocols followed by Groups A and B resulted in significant decreases in food dish TAC (P<0.001; 1.40; p=0.026; 0.604, respectively), as compared to Group C (p=0.373). Hot water (>160F) washing decreased TAC (p=0.005) over cold/lukewarm water. In the follow-up survey, 8% of Group A and B respondents reported likely to adhere to protocols long-term. This study suggests a need for pet food handling and dish hygiene guideline education to minimize bacterial contamination of dishes, especially in high-risk households.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Antimicrobial use in laboratory rodent facilities in Australia and New Zealand- a cross-sectional survey of veterinarians and facility managers 94%
- Prevalence and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants of Escherichia coli isolates obtained from meat in South Africa 94%
- SARS-COV-2 Virus Infected Patient Identification Through Canine Olfactive Detection On Axillary Sweat Samples 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Welfare concerns for mounted load carrying by working donkeys in Pakistan 93%
- A Cross-Sectional Survey of the Knowledge, Attitudes & Practices of Antimicrobial Users and Providers in an Area of High-Density Livestock-Human Population in Western Kenya 92%
- Reducing antimicrobial usage in small-scale chicken farms in Vietnam: A three-year intervention study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic Review of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Dairy Farmers and Consumers Towards Bovine Tuberculosis in Low- and Middle-Income Countries 92%
- Small-scale commercial chicken production: A risky business for farmers in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam 92%
- Movement patterns of urban free-roaming dogs: implications for rabies control in Arequipa, Peru 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is there a higher risk of exposure to Coxiella burnetii for pre-clinical veterinary students? 92%
- Evidence that faecal carriage of resistant Escherichia coli by 16-week-old dogs in the United Kingdom is associated with raw feeding 91%
- A standardized instrument quantifying risk factors associated with bi-directional transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other zoonotic pathogens: The COVID-19 Human-Animal Interactions Survey (CHAIS) 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.