Back

On Multiply Robust Mendelian Randomization (MR2) With Many Invalid Genetic Instruments

Sun, B.; Liu, Z.; Tchetgen Tchetgen, E.

2021-10-26 epidemiology
10.1101/2021.10.21.21265317 medRxiv
Show abstract

Mendelian randomization (MR) is a popular instrumental variable (IV) approach, in which genetic markers are used as IVs. In order to improve efficiency, multiple markers are routinely used in MR analyses, leading to concerns about bias due to possible violation of IV exclusion restriction of no direct effect of any IV on the out-come other than through the exposure in view. To address this concern, we introduce a new class of Multiply Robust MR (MR2) estimators that are guaranteed to remain consistent for the causal effect of interest provided that at least one genetic marker is a valid IV without necessarily knowing which IVs are invalid. We show that the proposed MR2 estimators are a special case of a more general class of estimators that remain consistent provided that a set of at least k{dagger} out of K candidate instrumental variables are valid, for k{dagger}[≤] K set by the analyst ex ante, without necessarily knowing which IVs are invalid. We provide formal semiparametric theory supporting our results, and characterize the semiparametric efficiency bound for the exposure causal effect which cannot be improved upon by any regular estimator with our favorable robustness property. We conduct extensive simulation studies and apply our methods to a large-scale analysis of UK Biobank data, demonstrating the superior empirical performance of MR2 compared to competing MR methods.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Statistics in Medicine
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.3%
3
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
5
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.8%
7
Biometrics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
8
The Annals of Applied Statistics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 18%
3.9%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.9%
11
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
12
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.1%
13
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Journal of Computational Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
18
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%