On Multiply Robust Mendelian Randomization (MR2) With Many Invalid Genetic Instruments
Sun, B.; Liu, Z.; Tchetgen Tchetgen, E.
Show abstract
Mendelian randomization (MR) is a popular instrumental variable (IV) approach, in which genetic markers are used as IVs. In order to improve efficiency, multiple markers are routinely used in MR analyses, leading to concerns about bias due to possible violation of IV exclusion restriction of no direct effect of any IV on the out-come other than through the exposure in view. To address this concern, we introduce a new class of Multiply Robust MR (MR2) estimators that are guaranteed to remain consistent for the causal effect of interest provided that at least one genetic marker is a valid IV without necessarily knowing which IVs are invalid. We show that the proposed MR2 estimators are a special case of a more general class of estimators that remain consistent provided that a set of at least k{dagger} out of K candidate instrumental variables are valid, for k{dagger}[≤] K set by the analyst ex ante, without necessarily knowing which IVs are invalid. We provide formal semiparametric theory supporting our results, and characterize the semiparametric efficiency bound for the exposure causal effect which cannot be improved upon by any regular estimator with our favorable robustness property. We conduct extensive simulation studies and apply our methods to a large-scale analysis of UK Biobank data, demonstrating the superior empirical performance of MR2 compared to competing MR methods.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Double Machine Learning Approach for the Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness under the Test-Negative Design: Analysis of Québec Administrative Data 96%
- Probabilistic Cause-of-disease Assignment using Case-control Diagnostic Tests: A Latent Variable Regression Approach 95%
- Bayesian Variable Selection with a Pleiotropic Loss Function in Mendelian Randomization 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Novel Penalized Inverse-Variance Weighted Estimator for Mendelian Randomization with Applications to COVID-19 Outcomes 97%
- A Generalized Robust Allele-based Genetic Association Test 96%
- Operating Characteristics of the Rank-Based Inverse Normal Transformation for Quantitative Trait Analysis in Genome-Wide Association Studies 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The winner's curse under dependence: repairing empirical Bayes using convoluted densities 94%
- Tree-informed Bayesian multi-source domain adaptation: cross-population probabilistic cause-of-death assignment using verbal autopsy 94%
- Survival Analysis on Rare Events Using Group-Regularized Multi-Response Cox Regression 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Two-Sample Robust Bayesian Mendelian Randomization Method Accounting for Linkage Disequilibrium and Idiosyncratic Pleiotropy with Applications to the COVID-19 Outcome 96%
- Identifying causal genotype-phenotype relationships for population-sampled parent-child trios 96%
- Case-Control Vs. Case-Only Estimates Of Gene-Environment Interactions With Common And Misclassified Clinical Diagosis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Two-Stage Multivariate Mendelian Randomization on Multiple Outcomes with Mixed Distributions 95%
- Causal Mediation Analysis with Multiple Causally Ordered and Non-ordered Mediators based on Summarized Genetic Data 93%
- A bivariate zero-inflated negative binomial model and its applications to biomedical settings 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.