Back

Wastewater and surface monitoring to detect COVID-19 in elementary school settings: The Safer at School Early Alert project

Fielding-Miller, R. K.; Karthikeyan, S.; Gaines, T.; Garfein, R. S.; Salido, R. A.; Cantu, V.; Kohn, L.; Wijaya, F. C.; Flores, M.; Omaleki, V.; Majnoonian, A.; Martin, N. K.; Austin, D.; Laurent, L. C.; Gonzalez-Zuniga, P.; Nguyen, M.; Vo, A. V.; Le, T. T.; Duong, D.; Hassani, A.; Tweeten, S.; Jepsen, K.; Henson, B.; Hakim, A.; Birmingham, A.; Mark, A. M.; Nasamran, C. A.; Rosenthal, S. B.; Moshiri, N.; Fisch, K. M.; Humphrey, G.; Farmer, S.; Tubb, H.; Valles, T.; Morris, J.; Kang, J.; Khaleghi, B.; Young, C.; Akel, A. D.; Eilert, S.; Eno, J.; Curewitz, K.; Rosing, T.; SEARCH, ; Knight, R.

2021-10-20 public and global health
10.1101/2021.10.19.21265226 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSchools are high-risk settings for SARS-CoV-2 transmission, but necessary for childrens educational and social-emotional wellbeing. Previous research suggests that wastewater monitoring can detect SARS-CoV-2 infections in controlled residential settings with high levels of accuracy. However, its effective accuracy, cost, and feasibility in non-residential community settings is unknown. MethodsThe objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness and accuracy of community-based passive wastewater and surface (environmental) surveillance to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection in neighborhood schools compared to weekly diagnostic (PCR) testing. We implemented an environmental surveillance system in nine elementary schools with 1700 regularly present staff and students in southern California. The system was validated from November 2020 - March 2021. FindingsIn 447 data collection days across the nine sites 89 individuals tested positive for COVID-19, and SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 374 surface samples and 133 wastewater samples. Ninety-three percent of identified cases were associated with an environmental sample (95% CI: 88% - 98%); 67% were associated with a positive wastewater sample (95% CI: 57% - 77%), and 40% were associated with a positive surface sample (95% CI: 29% - 52%). The techniques we utilized allowed for near-complete genomic sequencing of wastewater and surface samples. InterpretationPassive environmental surveillance can detect the presence of COVID-19 cases in non-residential community school settings with a high degree of accuracy. FundingCounty of San Diego, Health and Human Services Agency, National Institutes of Health, National Science Foundation, Centers for Disease Control

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Water
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
2
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
4
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
7
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.1%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.3%
9
ACS ES&T Water
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
10
Water Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
11
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.6%
12
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
13
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
14
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
15
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
17
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
19
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%