The premature mortality to incidence ratio (PREMIER): a person-centred measure of cancer burden
Banham, D.; Karnon, J.; Brown, A.; Roder, D.; Lynch, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundCancer control initiatives are informed by quantifying the capacity to reduce cancer burden through effective interventions. Burden measures using health administrative data are a sustainable way to support monitoring and evaluating of outcomes among patients and populations. The PREmature Mortality to IncidencE Ratio (PREMIER) is one such burden measure. We use data on Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal South Australians from 1990 to 2010 to show how PREMIER quantifies disparities in cancer burden: between populations; between sub-population cohorts where stage at diagnosis is available; and when follow-up is constrained to 24-months after diagnosis. MethodPREMIERcancer is the ratio of years of life expectancy lost due to cancer (YLLcancer) to life expectancy years at risk at time of cancer diagnosis (LYAR) for each person. The Global Burden of Disease standard life table provides referent life expectancies. PREMIERcancer was estimated for the population of cancer cases diagnosed in South Australia from 1990 to 2010. Cancer stage at diagnosis was also available for cancers diagnosed in Aboriginal people and a cohort of non-Aboriginal people matched by sex, year of birth, primary cancer site and year of diagnosis. ResultsCancers diagnoses (N=144,891) included 777 among Aboriginal people. Cancer burden described by PREMIERcancer was higher among Aboriginal than non-Aboriginal (0.55, 95%CIs 0.52-0.59 versus 0.39, 95%CIs 0.39-0.40). Diagnoses at younger ages among Aboriginal people, 7 year higher LYAR (31.0, 95%CIs 30.0-32.0 versus 24.1, 95%CIs 24.1-24.2) and higher premature cancer mortality (YLLcancer=16.3, 95%CIs 15.1-17.5 versus YLLcancer=8.2, 95%CIs 8.2-8.3) influenced this. Disparities in cancer burden between the matched Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal cohorts manifested 24-months after diagnosis with PREMIERcancer 0.44, 95%CIs 0.40-0.47 and 0.28, 95%CIs 0.25-0.31 respectively. ConclusionPREMIER described disproportionately higher cancer burden among Aboriginal people in comparisons involving: all people diagnosed with cancer; the matched cohorts; and, within groups diagnosed with same staged disease. The extent of disparities were evident 24-months after diagnosis. This is evidence of Aboriginal peoples substantial capacity to benefit from cancer control initiatives, particularly those leading to earlier detection and treatment of cancers. PREMIERs use of readily available, person-level administrative records can help evaluate health care initiatives addressing this need.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of worldwide, national and sub-national severity distributions in Burden of Disease studies: a case study of individual cancer types in Scotland 96%
- Socioeconomic inequalities of 3-year survival in formal employees with colorectal cancer between 2012 and 2019 in Colombia 92%
- Childhood Cancer Survival in the Highly Vulnerable Population of South Texas: A Cohort Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inequalities in relative cancer survival by race, immigration status, income, and education for 22 cancer sites in Canada, a cohort study 92%
- Cancer and the risk of COVID-19 diagnosis, hospitalisation, and death: a population-based multi-state cohort study including 4,618,377 adults in Catalonia, Spain 92%
- Cumulative COVID-19 incidence, mortality, and prognosis in cancer survivors: a population-based study in Reggio Emilia, Northern Italy 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnic inequalities in multiple long-term health conditions in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and narrative synthesis 91%
- Tattoo ink exposure is associated with lymphoma and skin cancers – a Danish study of twins 90%
- Sociodemographic characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 serosurveillance studies with diverse recruitment strategies, Canada, 2020 to 2023 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protective effect of a first SARS-CoV-2 infection from reinfection: a matched retrospective cohort study using PCR testing data in England 90%
- Covid-19 and excess mortality rates not comparable across countries 89%
- Excess respiratory, circulatory, neoplasm and other mortality rates during the Covid-19 pandemic in the EU and their implications 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnic differences in COVID-19 mortality during the first two waves of the Coronavirus Pandemic: a nationwide cohort study of 29 million adults in England 93%
- Different approaches to quantify years of life lost from COVID-19 91%
- Differential risk of healthcare workers versus the general population during outbreak, war and pandemic crises 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.