Safety and efficacy of a prehospital initiated protocol of nitrates plus non-invasive ventilation on prehospital and Emergency Department outcomes for acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema
Howard, I.; Castle, N.; Al Shaikh, L.; Owen, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundAcute heart failure is a common presentation to Emergency Departments (ED) the world over. Amongst the most common presenting signs and symptoms is dyspnoea due to acute pulmonary oedema, a life-threatening emergency that if left untreated or poorly managed. There is increasing evidence demonstrating improved outcomes following the use of vasodilators or non-invasive ventilation for these patients in the emergency setting. Consequently, the potential exists that initiating these therapies in the prehospital setting will similarly improve outcomes. MethodsA historical cohort study was conducted to assess the effect of a prehospital initiated treatment protocol of nitrates plus non-invasive ventilation (NIV) versus regular therapy for severe cardiogenic APO on all-cause in-hospital mortality at 7 days, 30 days, and in total. Secondary outcomes included changes in EMS respiratory and haemodynamic parameters; admission status; length of stay; and emergency endotracheal intubation. ResultsThe intervention led to an approximate 85% reduction in adjusted odds of mortality at 7 days compared to the regular therapy (AOR 0.15, 95% CI: 0.05 - 0.46, p = 0.001); approximate 80% reduction in odds of mortality at 30 days (AOR 0.19, 95% CI: 0.07 - 48, p < 0.0001); and Approximate 60% reduction in odds of total mortality (AOR 0.25, 95% CI: 0.12 - 0.56, p = 0.001). ConclusionThe results of this analysis provide strong evidence of the potential synergistic benefits that can be achieved with the early implementation of a simple treatment protocol of prehospital administered nitrates and initiation of NIV for cardiogenic APO.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study 95%
- Diversity of CPR manikins for basic life support education: Use of manikin sex, race, and body shape – A scoping review 95%
- Post-exertion oxygen saturation as a prognostic factor for adverse outcome in patients attending the emergency department with suspected COVID-19: Observational cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multimodal Prehabilitation in People Awaiting Acute Inpatient Cardiac Surgery: Study Protocol for a Pilot Feasibility Trial (PreP-ACe) 95%
- Derivation and validation of a triage tool for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study 95%
- Observational study of changes in utilization and outcomes in non-invasive ventilation in COVID-19 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of digital Early Warning Score (NEWS2) in a cardiac specialist setting: retrospective cohort study 95%
- Troponin Is Independently Associated With Death In Patients With COVID: A Retrospective Study 95%
- Exploring Associations with Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in COVID-19 Patients upon Admission: A Model for Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in 329 Unvaccinated, Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes of adult patients admitted with COVID-19 in East London: a retrospective cohort analysis 94%
- The Impact Of The COVID-19 Pandemic On Non-COVID-19 Community-Acquired Pneumonia, A Retrospective Cohort Study 92%
- Two-way remote monitoring allows effective and realistic provision of home-NIV to COPD patients with persistent hypercapnia 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Socioeconomic and comorbid factors affecting mortality and length of stay in COVID-19 93%
- Single-Center Hospital and Outpatient Opioid Use for Lower Extremity Arterial Disease 92%
- Hospitalist perspectives of available tests to monitor volume status in patients with heart failure: a qualitative study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.