Hierarchical Representation of Complex Intervention Sequences for Automated Subgroup Analysis in Critical Care Settings
Trivedi, A.; Ogallo, W.; Abebe, G.
Show abstract
Our understanding of the impact of interventions in critical care is limited by the lack of techniques that represent and analyze complex intervention spaces applied across heterogeneous patient populations. Existing work has mainly focused on selecting a few interventions and representing them as binary variables, resulting in oversimplification of intervention representation. The goal of this study is to find effective representations of sequential interventions to support intervention effect analysis. To this end, we have developed Hi-RISE (Hierarchical Representation of Intervention Sequences), an approach that transforms and clusters sequential interventions into a latent space, with the resulting clusters used for heterogenous treatment effect analysis. We apply this approach to the MIMIC III dataset and identified intervention clusters and corresponding subpopulations with peculiar odds of 28-day mortality. Our approach may lead to a better understanding of the subgrouplevel effects of sequential interventions and improve targeted intervention planning in critical care settings.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mining for Equitable Health: Assessing the Impact of Missing Data in Electronic Health Records 96%
- A methodology of phenotyping ICU patients from EHR data: high-fidelity, personalized, and interpretable phenotypes estimation 95%
- Using computable knowledge mined from the literature to elucidate confounders for EHR-based pharmacovigilance 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- High-dimensional Biomarker Identification for Scalable and Interpretable Disease Prediction via Machine Learning Models 94%
- ARAX: a graph-based modular reasoning tool for translational biomedicine 94%
- Neural Collective Matrix Factorization for Integrated Analysis of Heterogeneous Biomedical Data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.