COVID-19 and Mental Health: Predicted Mental Health Status is Associated with Clinical Symptoms and Pandemic-Related Psychological and Behavioral Responses
Chung, J. Y.; Gibbons, A.; Atlas, L.; Ballard, E.; Ernst, M.; Japee, S.; Farmer, C.; Shaw, J.; Pereira, F.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic led to dramatic threats to health and social life. Study objectives - develop a prediction model leveraging subsample of known Patient/Controls and evaluate the relationship of predicted mental health status to clinical outcome measures and pandemic-related psychological and behavioral responses during lockdown (spring/summer 2020). MethodsOnline cohort study conducted by National Institute of Mental Health Intramural Research Program. Convenience sample of English-speaking adults (enrolled 4/4-5/16/20; n=1,992). Enrollment measures: demographics, clinical history, functional status, psychiatric and family history, alcohol/drug use. Outcome measures (enrollment and q2 weeks/6 months): distress, loneliness, mental health symptoms, and COVID-19 survey. NIMH IRP Patient/Controls survey responses informed assignment of Patient Probability Scores (PPS) for all participants. Regression models analyzed the relationship between PPS and outcome measures. OutcomesMean age 46.0 ({+/-}14.7), female (82.4%), white (88.9 %). PPS correlated with distress, loneliness, depression, and mental health factors. PPS associated with negative psychological responses to COVID-19. Worry about mental health (OR 1.46) exceeded worry about physical health (OR 1.13). PPS not associated with adherence to social distancing guidelines but was with stress related to social distancing and worries about infection of self/others. InterpretationMental health status (PPS) was associated with concurrent clinical ratings and COVID-specific negative responses. A focus on mental health during the pandemic is warranted, especially among those with mental health vulnerabilities. We will include PPS when conducting longitudinal analyses of mental health trajectories and risk and resilience factors that may account for differing clinical outcomes. FundingNIMH (ZIAMH002922); NCCIH (ZIAAT000030)
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Which traits predict elevated distress during the Covid-19 pandemic? Results from a large, longitudinal cohort study with psychiatric patients and healthy controls 95%
- General Anxiety Disorder-7 Questionnaire as a marker of low socioeconomic status and inequity 95%
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies comparing mental health before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emotional Adaptation During A Crisis: Decline in Anxiety and Depression After the Initial Weeks of COVID-19 in the United States 95%
- Multiple-time measurements of multidimensional psychiatric states from immediately before the COVID-19 pandemic to one year later: A longitudinal online survey of the Japanese population 94%
- Predicting remission after internet-delivered psychotherapy in patients with depression using machine learning and multi-modal data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patients with affective disorders profit most from telemedical treatment: Evidence from a naturalistic patient cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- Mental Health Impact of COVID-19: A global study of risk and resilience factors 94%
- Mental and social health of children and adolescents with pre-existing mental or somatic problems during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The prevalence, incidence, prognosis and risk factors for depression and anxiety in a UK cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- Did social factors buffer against the effect of adversities on self-harm during the COVID-19 pandemic? A longitudinal analysis of 49,227 UK adults 93%
- The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: a two-wave cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Positive End of the Polygenic Score Distribution for ADHD: A Low Risk or a Protective Factor? 93%
- Using Major Depression Polygenic Risk Scores to Explore the Depressive Symptom Continuum 93%
- Social relationships and depression during the COVID-19 lockdown: longitudinal analysis of the COVID-19 social study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.