Back

Computational and experimental studies of plasmodium falciparum protein PfAMA1 domain-II loop dynamics: implications in PfAMA1-PfRON2 binding event

Sinha, S.; Biswas, A.; Mondal, J.; Mandal, K.

2021-10-10 biochemistry
10.1101/2021.10.10.463826 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Protein-protein interactions are important targets for various drug discovery campaigns. One such promising and therapeutically pertinent protein-protein complex is PfAMA1-PfRON2 involved in malarial parasite invasion into human red blood cells. A thorough understanding of the interactions between these macromolecular binding partners is crucial for designing better therapeutics against this age-old disease. Although crystal structures of several PfAMA1-PfRON2 complexes are available, the mechanism of how domain II loop associates with PfRON2 is not clear. The current work investigates how the domain II loop of PfAMA1 exerts its effect on the alpha helix of the PfRON2, thus influencing the overall kinetics of this intricate recognition phenomenon. To this end, we have computationally simulated the dynamics and free energetics of domain II loop closing processes and identified a set of key amino acid residues of PfRON2 helix which are essential for binding. The subsequent evaluation of the binding affinity of Ala-substituted PfRON2 peptide ligands by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) validates the relative importance of the residues in context. Together, the combination of computational and experimental investigation reveals that the domain II loop of PfAMA1 is in fact responsible for arresting the PfRON2 molecule from egress, K2027 and D2028 of PfRON2 being the determinant residues for the capturing event. Our study provides a comprehensive understanding of the molecular recognition event between PfAMA1 and PfRON2, specifically in the post binding stage, which could potentially open up new avenues to drug discovery against malaria. TOC GRAPHIC O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=95 SRC="FIGDIR/small/463826v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (35K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c26022org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@356357org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10ceb04org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1195633_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.