Back

Projected dynamics of breeding habitat suitability for a steppe-land bird warrant anticipatory conservation actions

Simoncini, A.; Ramellini, S.; Martineau, A.; Massolo, A.; Giunchi, D.

2021-10-05 ecology
10.1101/2021.10.04.462847 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding spatial and temporal variations of habitat suitability is fundamental for species conservation under global change. Steppic species are particularly sensitive to anthropogenic change and have undergone large declines in the last decades. We aimed to describe current and future breeding habitat suitability for the Eurasian stone-curlew Burhinus oedicnemus, a steppic species of conservation concern, and to identify critical areas for its conservation. We collected 1628 presence records covering the period 1992-2016. We developed a species distribution model using a dynamic Maxent algorithm and a set of pseudo-absences with a spatial density weighted on a fixed kernel density estimated on the presences, to mitigate the potential sampling bias. We projected this model under a set of carbon emission, socioeconomic and land-use/land-cover scenarios for the years 2030, 2050, 2070 and 2090. Finally, we described the cell-wise and mean change of breeding habitat suitability through consecutive time intervals and identified the areas critical for the species conservation. All scenarios predicted a short-term northward shift of suitable areas, followed by a period of stability. We found no consistent trends in the mean change of breeding habitat suitability, and similar extents of suitable areas under current and future scenarios. Critical areas for the conservation of the species are mainly located in Northern Europe, Israel and parts of North Africa, the Iberian Peninsula and Italy. According to our results, the Eurasian stone-curlew has the potential to maintain viable populations in the Western Palearctic, but dispersal limitations might hinder the colonization of shifted suitable areas. Targeted conservation interventions in the critical areas are therefore recommended to secure the future of the species under global change.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
2
Diversity and Distributions
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.7%
4
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.8%
5
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
7
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.4%
8
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
9
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
10
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
11
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
12
Landscape Ecology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
15
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
16
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
17
Biodiversity and Conservation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
Ecological Modelling
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
20
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%