Back

Diffusion MRI Metrics and their Relation to Dementia Severity: Effects of Harmonization Approaches

Thomopoulos, S. I.; Nir, T. M.; Villalon-Reina, J. E.; Zavaliangos-Petropulu, A.; Maiti, P.; Zheng, H.; Nourollahimoghadam, E.; Jahanshad, N.; Thompson, P. M.

2021-10-05 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2021.10.04.21263994 medRxiv
Show abstract

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) is sensitive to microstructural changes in the brain that occur with normal aging and Alzheimers disease (AD). There is much interest in which dMRI measures are most strongly correlated with clinical measures of AD severity, such as the clinical dementia rating (CDR), and biological processes that may be disrupted in AD, such as brain amyloid load measured using PET. Of these processes, some can be targeted using novel drugs. Since 2016, the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) has collected dMRI data from three scanner manufacturers across 58 sites using 7 different protocols that vary in angular resolution, scan duration, and in the number and distribution of diffusion-weighted gradients. Here, we assessed dMRI data from 730 of those individuals (447 cognitively normal controls, 214 with mild cognitive impairment, 69 with dementia; age: 74.1{+/-}7.9 years; 381 female/349 male). To harmonize data from different protocols, we applied ComBat, ComBat-GAM, and CovBat to dMRI metrics from 28 white matter regions of interest. We ranked all dMRI metrics in order of the strength of clinically relevant associations, and assessed how this depended on the harmonization methods employed. dMRI metrics were associated with age and clinical impairment, but also with amyloid positivity. All harmonization methods gave comparable results while enabling data integration across multiple scanners and protocols.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.