Back

Drop of Prevalence after Population Expansion: A lower prevalence for recessive disorders in a random mating population is a transient phenomenon during and after a growth phase

La Rocca, L. A.; Frank, J.; Bentzen, H. B.; Pantel, J.-T.; Gerischer, K.; Bovier, A.; Krawitz, P.

2021-09-30 genetics
10.1101/2021.09.29.462290 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite increasing data from population-wide sequencing studies, the risk for recessive disorders in consanguineous partnerships is still heavily debated. An important aspect that has not sufficiently been investigated theoretically, is the influence of inbreeding on mutation load and incidence rates when the population sizes change. We therefore developed a model to study these dynamics for a wide range of growth and mating conditions. In the phase of population expansion and shortly afterwards, our simulations show that there is a drop of diseased individuals at the expense of an increasing mutation load for random mating, while both parameters remain almost constant in highly consanguineous partnerships. This explains the empirical observation in present times that a high degree of consanguinity is associated with an increased risk of autosomal recessive disorders. However, it also states that the higher frequency of severe recessive disorders with developmental delay in inbred populations is a transient phenomenon before a mutation-selection balance is reached again. Author summaryWhat determines the recessive disease burden? The empirical observation that the proportion of intellectual disability of autosomal recessive cause is usually higher in offspring of consanguineous partnerships may lead to a misunderstanding about the mechanisms at work. In any population, selection removes pathogenic alleles from the gene pool while the de novo mutation rate adds novel pathogenic alleles. For comparable mutation rates, the incidence of severe recessive disease should be comparable in mutation-selection balance, regardless of the mating scheme. Different incidences can therefore only be explained by population dynamics that are not in equilibrium. We studied in simulated populations the time scales in which mutation-selection balance is reached after a growth phase and found that the mating scheme has a big impact on this lag time. When cousins mate preferentially with cousins, a few generations after a ten-fold increase in size the new equilibrium is established. In contrast, for random-mating, the transient advantage of a lower incidence may last for hundreds of generations, while the mutation load increases. By this means, our findings also highlight the importance of better carrier screens in the future for genetic consultations.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Theoretical Population Biology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.1%
2
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.2%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.2%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 7%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.5%
7
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
8
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
9
Journal of Mathematical Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
10
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
11
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
17
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
18
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
19
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
20
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
European Journal of Human Genetics
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%