Patient Attitudes About Light Therapy and Negative Ion Therapy for Nonseasonal Depression: An Online Survey Study.
Lahouaoula, I.; Li, V. W.; Scott, A.; Do, A.; Michalak, E. E.; Murphy, J. K.; Huang, S.; Lam, R. W.
Show abstract
ObjectiveNo studies have yet evaluated whether light therapy or negative ion therapy can be used as maintenance treatment after acute treatment with antidepressants in patients with major depressive disorder. To address the importance of this question, we surveyed participants with depression to determine their knowledge and attitudes about light therapy and negative ion therapy, and their willingness to participate in a randomized clinical trial with these therapies substituting for antidepressants for maintenance treatment. MethodsParticipants with a self-reported diagnosis of depression were recruited by email, newsletters, and social media to complete an online survey with questions about awareness and effectiveness of light therapy and negative ion therapy for depression. Vignettes describing the use of these therapies for maintenance treatment were presented with follow up questions about the ease of use and reasons for wanting (and not wanting) to use the therapies instead of antidepressants. Another vignette described a randomized study with these therapies followed by questions on whether participants would likely volunteer for the study. Chi-square tests were used to examine differences in responses between therapies. ResultsA total of 221 participants completed the survey. Most of them were aware of both therapies, but more participants had heard of light therapy (95% compared to 62% for negative ion therapy, p<0.0001), had used light therapy (28% versus 16%, p<0.003), and regarded light therapy as effective (54% versus 37%, p<0.001). Both therapies were considered easy to use. The majority of participants (78%) thought that it was important to find non-medication therapies for maintenance treatment, and 77% responded that they would likely volunteer for a randomized study to determine efficacy of the two therapies for maintenance treatment. ConclusionPeople with depression are generally aware of light therapy and negative ion therapy and believe they would be good therapies to substitute for antidepressants in maintenance treatment. These findings support the importance and feasibility for a randomized relapse prevention trial with light therapy and negative ion therapy in patients with depression.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting intentions towards long-term antidepressant use in the management of people with depression in primary care: A longitudinal survey study 96%
- Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Systematic Review Protocol: The Effects of Theory-Based Interventions for Self-Help Practices in the Management of Mild to Moderate Depression 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote virtual reality assessment elucidates self-blame-related action tendencies in depression 94%
- Unilateral and Bilateral Theta Burst Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Follow up on a Naturalistic Observation Study 91%
- Estimating heterogeneity of treatment effect in psychiatric clinical trials 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy with antidepressant treatment in patients with treatment-resistant depression in Japan 93%
- Subjective mental health and need for care among psychiatric outpatients during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from an outreach initiative in Sweden 92%
- The Relationship between Cannabis Use and Cognition in People with Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Scoping Review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Applications of Large Language Models in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review 94%
- Patients with affective disorders profit most from telemedical treatment: Evidence from a naturalistic patient cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Psychedelic mushrooms in the USA: Knowledge, patterns of use and association with health outcomes 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.