How many giraffes are there? A comparison of abundance estimators at Ongava Game Reserve, Namibia
Bonenfant, C.; Stratford, K.; Periquet, S.
Show abstract
Camera-traps are a versatile and widely adopted tool for collecting biological data for wildlife conservation and management. While estimating population abundance from camera-trap data is the primarily goal of many projects, the question of which population estimator is suitable for analysing these data needs to be investigated. We took advantage of a 21 day camera-trap monitoring period of giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis angolensis) on the Ongava Game Reserve (Namibia) to compare capture-recapture (CR), rarefaction curves and N-mixture estimators of population abundance. A marked variation in detection probability of giraffes was observed both in time and between individuals. Giraffes were also less likely to be detected after they were seen at a waterhole (mean daily visit frequency of f = 0.25). We estimated the population size to be 119 giraffes (Cv = 0.10) using the most robust reference estimator (CR). All other estimators deviated from the CR population size by ca. -20 to > +80%. This was due the fact that these models did not account for the temporal and individual variations in detection probability. We found that modelling choice was much less forgiving for N-mixture models than CR estimators because it leads to very variable and inconsistent estimations of abundance. Double counts were problematic for N-mixture models, challenging the use of raw counts (i.e. when individuals are not identified) at waterholes, to monitor the abundance of giraffe or of other species without idiosyncratic coat patterns.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- How citizen science could improve Species Distribution Models and their independent assessment 94%
- How do King Cobras move across a major highway? Unintentional wildlife crossing structures may facilitate movement. 94%
- Using known births to account for delayed marking in population estimation of North Atlantic right whales 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Insights on the effect of mega-carcass abundance on the population dynamics of a facultative scavenger predator and its prey 96%
- Long term trend and short-term dynamics of a willow ptarmigan population 95%
- Estimating abundance of a recovering transboundary brown bear population with capture-recapture models 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating opportunistic and structured non-invasive surveys with spatial capture-recapture models to map connectivity of the Pyrenean brown bear population 95%
- Terrain ruggedness and human activities influence the distribution of Grauer's gorillas (Gorilla beringei graueri) and eastern chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in the Tayna Nature Reserve, Democratic Republic of Congo 95%
- Informing Extinction Risk: Summarizing Population Viability through a Meta-analysis of Multiple Long-term Monitoring Programs for a Declining Estuarine Fish Species 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence for a growing population of eastern migratory monarch butterflies is currently insufficient (with extinction risk analyses) 93%
- Vigilance response of a key prey species to anthropogenic and natural threats in Detroit 93%
- Hierarchical, Memory-based Movement Models for Translocated Elk (Cervus canadensis) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating and integrating spatial capture-recapture models with data of variable individual identifiability 96%
- An efficient method of evaluating multiple concurrent management actions on invasive populations 96%
- Bayesian areal disaggregation regression to predict wildlife distribution and relative density with low-resolution data 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.