Back

Investigation of the impact of stool collection methods on the metabolomics analysis/profiles of infant fecal samples

Homann, C.-M.; Dizzell, S.; Azab, S.; Hutton, E. K.; GI-MDH Consortium, ; Morrison, K. M.; Stearns, J. C.

2021-09-21 biochemistry
10.1101/2021.09.21.461251 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Metabolomic studies are important to understand microbial metabolism and interaction between the host and the gut microbiome. Although there have been efforts to standardize sample processing in metabolomic studies, infant samples are mostly disregarded. In birth cohort studies, the use of diaper liners is prevalent and its impact on fecal metabolic profile remains untested. In this study, we compared metabolite profiles of fecal samples collected as solid stool and those collected from stool saturated liner. One infants stool sample was collected in triplicate for solid stool and stool saturated liner. Comprehensive metabolomics analysis of the fecal samples was performed using NMR, UPLC and DI-MS. The total number, identities and concentrations of the metabolites were determined and compared between stool sample collection methods (stool vs. liner). The number and identity of metabolites did not differ between collection methods for NMR and DI-MS when excluding metabolites with a coefficient of variation (CV) > 40%. NMR analysis demonstrated lowest bias between collection methods, and lowest technical precision between triplicates of the same method followed by DI-MS then UPLC. Concentrations of many metabolites from stool and stool saturated liner differed significantly as revealed by Bland-Altman plots and t-tests. Overall, a mean bias of 10.2% in the Bland-Altman analysis was acceptable for some metabolites confirming mutual agreement but not for others with a wide range of bias (-97-117%). Consequently, stool and stool-saturated liner could be used interchangeably only for some select metabolite classes e.g. amino acids. Differences between the metabolomic profiles of solid stool samples and stool saturated liner samples for some important molecules e.g., ethanol, fumarate, short chain fatty acids and bile acids, indicate the need for standardization in stool collection method for metabolomic studies performed in infants.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.7%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.8%
3
Metabolomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
4
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
5
BioTechniques
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
7
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
8
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
9
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
11
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
12
Journal of Proteomics
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
13
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
14
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
17
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
19
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
24
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
28
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%