Deleterious drugs in COVID-19: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis
Holder, M. W.; Heeney, C.; Malden, S.; Perera, U.; Sheikh, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundConcerns have been expressed about a number of drugs that potentially worsen outcomes in patients with COVID-19. We sought to identify all potentially deleterious drug groups in COVID-19 and critically assess the underpinning strength of evidence pertaining to the harmful effects of these drugs. Methods and findingsWe performed a rapid systematic review, searching Medline, Embase and two COVID-19 portfolios (WHO COVID-19 database and NIH iSearch COVID-19 portfolio) for papers and preprints related to primary studies investigating drugs identified as potentially deleterious. Primary outcomes were direct measures of susceptibility to infection, disease severity and mortality. Study quality was assessed using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute quality assessment tools. Random-effects meta-analyses were used for data synthesis with further subgroup analyses where possible for specific outcome, study design, statistical adjustment and drug groups when two were combined. Sensitivity analyses were performed by removing any studies at high risk of bias and by publication status. 49 observational studies (15 peer-reviewed papers and 34 preprints) reported primary outcomes for eight drug groups hypothesised to be deleterious. Meta-analysis showed that acute inpatient corticosteroid use was associated with increased mortality (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.26-3.90), however this result appeared to have been biased by confounding via indication. One subgroup analysis indicated an association between immunosuppressant use and susceptibility to COVID-19 among case control and cross-sectional studies (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.19-1.40) but this was not found with cohort studies (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.86-1.43). Studies which adjusted for multiple confounders showed that people taking angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin-II-receptor blockers (ARBs) required a lower level of care (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.98). Furthermore, studies which combined these two drug groups in their analysis demonstrated an association with a lower mortality (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.55-0.85). ConclusionsWe found minimal high quality or consistent evidence that any drug groups increase susceptibility, severity or mortality in COVID-19. Converse to initial hypotheses, we found some evidence that regular use of ACEIs and ARBs prior to infection may be effective in reducing the level of care required, such as requiring intensive care, in patients with COVID-19.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Preclinical Efficacy in Investigator’s Brochures: Stakeholders’ views on measures to improve Completeness and Robustness 93%
- A comprehensive assessment of statin discontinuation among patients who concurrently initiate statins and CYP3A4-inhibitor drugs; a multistate transition model 92%
- Antihypertensive Medications and COVID-19 Diagnosis and Mortality: Population-based Case-Control Analysis in the United Kingdom 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Colchicine use in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis 96%
- The Effect of Famotidine on Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 95%
- Application of observational research methods to real-world studies for rare disease drugs: a scoping review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- DrugWAS: Leveraging drug-wide association studies to facilitate drug repurposing for COVID-19 93%
- Dangers of ACE inhibitor and ARB usage in COVID-19: evaluating the evidence 93%
- Role of Drugs used for chronic disease management on Susceptibility and Severity of COVID-19: A Large Case-Control Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Favipiravir versus Arbidol for COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial 92%
- Assessment of Hydroxychloroquine and Chloroquine Safety Profiles: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 91%
- Echinacea purpurea for the Long-term Prevention of Viral Respiratory Tract Infections during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized, Open, Controlled, Exploratory Clinical Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions of the Type 2 Antidiabetic Drug Class Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV inhibitors (DPP4i): Can polypharmacology help explain? 91%
- Repurposed medicines: a scan of the non-commercial clinical research landscape 90%
- Prevention of Drug-Induced Lung Fibrosis via Inhibition of the MRTF/SRF Transcription Pathway 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.