Supervised Hierarchical Autoencoders for Multi-Omics Integration in Cancer Survival Models
Wissel, D.; Rowson, D.; Boeva, V.
Show abstract
With decreasing costs of high-throughput sequencing, more and more datasets providing omics profiles of cancer patients become available. Thus, novel survival analysis approaches integrating these differently sized and heterogeneous molecular and clinical groups of variables start being developed. Due to the difficulty of the task of multi-omics data integration, the Cox Proportional-Hazards (PH) model using clinical data has remained one of the best-performing techniques, barely outperformed by models using molecular data modalities. There is therefore a need for methods that can successfully perform multi-omics integration in survival analysis and outperform the clinical Cox PH model. Moreover, while certain deep learning methods have been shown to provide state-of-the-art accuracy of cancer survival prediction, most of them show no benefit or even decay in performance when integrating a larger number of modalities, further motivating a need to investigate how modality-specific representations should be integrated when using neural networks for multi-omics integration. We benchmarked multiple integration techniques for a neural network architecture, revealing that hierarchical autoencoder-based integration of modality-specific representations outperformed other methods such as max-pooling and was comparable with state-of-the-art statistical approaches for multi-omics integration. Further, we showed that the hierarchical autoencoder-based integration of modality-specific representations achieved increased performance through a soft modality selection mechanism, focusing on the most informative modalities for each cancer. We thus framed multiomics integration as a partial group-wise feature selection problem, highlighting that only those models performed well that could adequately weight important modalities in the presence of the high noise imposed by less important modalities.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel multi-omics deconfounding variational autoencoders can obtain meaningful disease subtyping 96%
- Evaluation of out-of-distribution detection methods for data shifts in single-cell transcriptomics 94%
- Species-Agnostic Transfer Learning for Cross-species Transcriptomics Data Integration without Gene Orthology 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Highly Accurate Cancer Phenotype Prediction with AKLIMATE, a Stacked Kernel Learner Integrating Multimodal Genomic Data and Pathway Knowledge 95%
- A variational autoencoder trained with priors from canonical pathways increases the interpretability of transcriptome data 95%
- A Deep Survival EWAS approach estimating risk profile based on pre-diagnostic DNA methylation: an application to Breast Cancer time to diagnosis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Robust Evaluation of Deep Learning-based Representation Methods for Survival and Gene Essentiality Prediction on Bulk RNA-seq Data 96%
- Generalising uncertainty improves accuracy and safety of deep learning analytics applied to oncology 94%
- Spatial Transcriptomics Inferred from Pathology Whole-Slide Images Links Tumor Heterogeneity to Survival in Breast and Lung Cancer 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.