Back

Vascular flow simulations using SimVascular and OpenFOAM

Yogeswaran, S.; Liu, F.

2021-09-15 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2021.09.11.21263191
Show abstract

Applications of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques to aid in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease have entered the research domain in recent years, due to their ability to provide valuable patient-specific information without risks associated with highly invasive procedures. SimVascular [1] [2] is an open-source software which allows streamlined processing and CFD blood flow analysis of medical imaging data. OpenFOAM [3] is a proven open-source software which allows for versatile modeling of various fluid dynamics phenomena. In this study, both SimVascular and OpenFOAM simulations are set up with identical computational mesh, similar numerical schemes, boundary conditions, and material properties, to model blood flow in the coronary artery of a 10 year old patient with Coarctation of the Aorta (CoA) who underwent end-to-side anastomosis. Difference in the flow fields such as flow rate, pressure, vorticity, and wall shear stress between SimVascular and OpenFOAM are analyzed. Similar results are obtained in both simulations up to a certain model time, before the results become drastically different. Both the similarities and differences are documented and discussed.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 29%
16.0%
2
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
10.6%
3
Computers in Biology and Medicine
based on 39 papers
Top 0.4%
7.9%
4
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 2%
6.7%
5
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 30%
6.1%
6
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
based on 33 papers
Top 3%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 3%
4.7%
8
Frontiers in Physiology
based on 18 papers
Top 0.5%
3.1%
9
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 6%
2.9%
10
Heart Rhythm
based on 16 papers
Top 1%
2.5%
11
IEEE Access
based on 11 papers
Top 0.5%
2.5%
12
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 3%
2.3%
13
Biomedicines
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
14
Royal Society Open Science
based on 49 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
15
Sensors
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
16
The American Journal of Cardiology
based on 15 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
17
Healthcare
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Open Heart
based on 18 papers
Top 4%
1.2%
19
International Journal of Cardiology
based on 13 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 11%
0.8%
21
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
22
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
based on 11 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Diagnostics
based on 36 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
25
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 13%
0.7%