Back

Benchmarking feature quality assurance strategies for non-targeted metabolomics

El Abiead, Y.; Milford, M.; Schoeny, H.; Rusz, M.; Salek, R. M.; Koellensperger, G.

2021-09-11 bioinformatics
10.1101/2021.09.09.459600 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Automated data pre-processing (DPP) forms the basis of any liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry-driven non-targeted metabolomics experiment. However, current strategies for quality control of this important step have rarely been investigated or even discussed. We exemplified how reliable benchmark peak lists could be generated for eleven publicly available datasets acquired across different instrumental platforms. Moreover, we demonstrated how these benchmarks can be utilized to derive performance metrics for DPP and tested whether these metrics can be generalized for entire datasets. Relying on this principle, we cross-validated different strategies for quality assurance of DPP, including manual parameter adjustment, variance of replicate injection-based metrics, unsupervised clustering performance, automated parameter optimization, and deep learning-based classification of chromatographic peaks. Overall, we want to highlight the importance of assessing DPP performance on a regular basis.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.