Gene Set Analysis for time-to-event outcome with the Generalized Berk-Jones statistic
Villain, L.; Ferte, T.; Thiebaut, R.; Hejblum, B. P.
Show abstract
Gene set analysis evaluates the collective impact of groups of genes on an outcome of interest, such as disease occurrence. By incorporating biological knowledge through predefined gene sets, this approach enhances the interpretability of results and improves statistical power compared to gene-wise analyses. In the context of time-to-event data, existing methods are limited and fail to account for potentially strong correlations within gene sets. Given the strong performance of the Generalized Berk-Jones (GBJ) statistic, which effectively incorporates correlation within the test statistic, we adapted this method to the time-to-event framework using a Cox model. We then compared its performance with established methods, including the Wald test, global test, and global boost test. Our proposed method, sGBJ, shows an over-control of Type I error, leading to reduced statistical power compared to other methods in numerical studies. We further benchmarked these methods in two different real-world contexts: gliomas and breast cancer. The Wald test emerged as the most effective, identifying the largest number of significant pathways while maintaining appropriate control of Type I error in simulation settings. sGBJ closely followed demonstrating good performances, without a significant loss of statistical power in analyzing these two real-world biomedical datasets.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-model approach for powerful testing of genetic associations with cancer risk incorporating tumor characteristics 95%
- Overcoming the impacts of two-step batch effect correction on gene expression estimation and inference 94%
- Fast Lasso method for Large-scale and Ultrahigh-dimensional Cox Model with applications to UK Biobank 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Network-centric Framework for theEvaluation of Mutual Exclusivity Tests onCancer Drivers 93%
- New analysis framework incorporating mixed mutual information and scalable Bayesian networks for multimodal high dimensional genomic and epigenomic cancer data 93%
- Cancer as a tissue anomaly: classifying tumor transcriptomes based only on healthy data 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.