Prevalence and Incidence of Stress, Depression and Anxiety Symptoms among Brazilians in Quarantine across the early phases of the COVID-19 Crisis
Blacutt, M.; Filgueiras, A. J.; Stults-Kolehmainen, M. A.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe present study aimed to measure the prevalence and incidence of stress, depression, and anxiety symptoms in Brazilians during the COVID-19 pandemic. MethodWe assessed 103 (54 women, 49 men) participants online in three periods of the pandemic: March 2020 (T1), April 2020 (T2), and June 2020 (T3). Prevalence and incidence were identified when mental health scores were two standard deviations above the mean compared to normative data. Mental health indicators were measured using the Perceived Stress Scale, the Filgueiras Depression Index, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory - State Subscale. ResultsAt T1, 89% of individuals were below cut-off scores for stress, anxiety, and depression, which dropped to 35% by T3. Stress prevalence was 1.9% at T1, 7.8% at T2, and 28.2% at T3. Depression prevalence was 0% at T1, 23.3% at T2, and 25.2% at T3. State anxiety prevalence was 10.7% at T1, 11.7% at T2, and 45.6% at T3. Stress incidence increased by 7.8% from T1 to T2, and 23.3% from T2 to T3. Depression incidence increased by 23.3% from T1 to T2, and 15.5% from T2 to T3. Anxiety incidence increased by 9.7% from T1 to T2, and 39.8% from T2 to T3. Stress severity scores significantly increased from 16.1{+/-}8.7 at T1 to 23.5{+/-}8.4 at T2, and 30.3{+/-}6.0 at T3. Depression severity scores significantly increased from 48.5{+/-}20.5 at T1 to 64.7{+/-}30.2 at T2, and 75.9{+/-}26.1 at T3. Anxiety increased from 49.0{+/-}13.4 at T1 to 53.5{+/-}12.5 at T2 and 62.3{+/-}13.4 at T3. Females had significantly higher anxiety scores than males by T3 (66.7{+/-}11.8 vs. 57.4{+/-}13.5). ConclusionPrevalence and incidence of stress, depression, and anxiety significantly increased throughout the pandemic. The largest increase in stress and anxiety occurred between T2 and T3, and between T1 and T2 for depression. Severity of stress, depression, and anxiety increased throughout the study.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Closed Doors: Predictors of Stress, Anxiety, Depression, and PTSD During the Onset of COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil 98%
- Frequency of Depressive Symptoms and Suicidal Ideation Among University Students Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic 95%
- Prevalence and Risk Factors for Acute Posttraumatic Stress Disorder during the COVID-19 Outbreak 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The association between stigmatizing attitudes towards depression and help seeking attitudes in college students 97%
- Changes in hospital staff mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic: longitudinal results from the international COPE-CORONA study 97%
- Depressive and anxiety symptoms and COVID-19-related factors among men and women in Nigeria 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between stress and depressive symptoms and the Covid-19 pandemic 95%
- Attitude towards Mental Help-Seeking, Motivation, and Economic Resources in Connection with Positive, Negative, and General Psychopathological Symptoms of Schizophrenia: A Pilot Study of a Psychoeducation Program 94%
- Mental and social health of children and adolescents with pre-existing mental or somatic problems during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The prevalence, incidence and risk factors of mental health problems and mental health services use before and 9 months after the COVID-19 outbreak among the general Dutch population. A 3-wave prospective study 96%
- Differential associations between SARS-CoV-2 infection, perceived burden of the pandemic and mental health in the German population-based cohort for digital health research 95%
- Global burden of mental health problems among children and adolescents during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic umbrella review 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.