Back

Perceptions and experiences of rare diseases among General Practitioners: an exploratory study

mcmullan, j.; Crowe, A. L.; McClenaghan, T.; McAneney, H.; McKnight, A. J.

2021-09-12 public and global health
10.1101/2021.09.07.21263025 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGeneral Practitioners (GPs) play an important role in healthcare delivery for people living with a rare disease and their families. Managing long-term multisystem diseases that often have no cure and sub-optimal treatment options can be extremely challenging. AimTo gain an understanding of GPs perception and experience of rare diseases. Design and SettingThis is an exploratory study with GPs from Northern Ireland. MethodAn online survey was hosted within SmartSurvey, available for 6 weeks in early 2019, which queried: GPs career to date, interactions with rare disease patients, challenges faced, the exchange of information with patients, priorities for the future, support for such patients and finally training. ResultsSixty-six GPs engaged with the survey with 15 completing the survey. Many frustrations were mentioned by GPs when caring for such patients including finding a diagnosis, lack of specialist services and lack of awareness. Seventy-nine percent of GPs responding did not feel adequately trained to care for patients with a rare disease, while 93% were interested in undertaking training to enable them to improve their care for rare disease patients. ConclusionMore effective and convenient rare disease focused training programs would help GPs manage patients with rare diseases. Enabling efficient, effective communication between GPs and individual medical specialists is of paramount importance to give GPs access to information on how to effectively manage patients living with a rare disease. Awareness should be raised for effective support mechanisms such as charities and support groups for rare disease patients. How this fits inMany GPs have reported feeling overwhelmed when caring for rare disease patients. Their lack of knowledge forces them to turn to the internet but finding reliable information is often difficult. This study acknowledges the difficult task GPs face when caring for this population and highlights the need for training development, improved communication, and better awareness.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
4
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
7
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
9
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
10
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
15
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
18
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
20
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%