Back

Using hypertemporal Sentinel-1 data to predict forest growing stock volume

Ge, S.; Tomppo, E.; Rauste, Y.; McRoberts, R. E.; Praks, J.; Gu, H.; Su, W.; Antropov, O.

2021-09-04 ecology
10.1101/2021.09.02.458789 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In this study, we assess the potential of long time series of Sentinel-1 SAR data to predict forest growing stock volume and evaluate the temporal dynamics of the predictions. The boreal coniferous forests study site is located near the Hyytiala forest station in central Finland and covers an area of 2,500 km2 with nearly 17,000 stands. We considered several prediction approaches (linear, support vector and random forests regression) and fine-tuned them to predict growing stock volume in several evaluation scenarios. The analyses used 96 Sentinel-1 images acquired over three years. Different approaches for aggregating SAR images and choosing feature (predictor) variables were evaluated. Our results demonstrate considerable decrease in RMSEs of growing stock volume as the number of images increases. While prediction accuracy using individual Sentinel-1 images varied from 85 to 91 m3/ha RMSE (relative RMSE 50-53%), RMSE with combined images decreased to 75.6 m3/ha (relative RMSE 44%). Feature extraction and dimension reduction techniques facilitated achieving the near-optimal prediction accuracy using only 8-10 images. When using assemblages of eight consecutive images, the GSV was predicted with the greatest accuracy when initial acquisitions started between September and January. HighlightsO_LITime series of 96 Sentinel-1 images is analysed over study area with 17,762 forest stands. C_LIO_LIRigorous evaluation of tools for SAR feature selection and GSV prediction. C_LIO_LIImproved periodic seasonality using assemblages of consecutive Sentinel-1 images. C_LIO_LIAnalysis of combining images acquired in "frozen" and "dry summer" conditions. C_LIO_LICompetitive estimates using calculation of prediction errors with stand-area weighting. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Remote Sensing
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 9%
19.0%
3
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
5
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.3%
8
Forest Ecology and Management
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
9
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.2%
11
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
12
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
13
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
14
Environmental Research Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
15
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
16
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
17
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Marine Science
62 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
21
Sustainability
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
22
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
23
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%