Back

Robust, data-driven bioregionalizations emerge from diversity concordance

Montalvo-Mancheno, C. S.; Buettel, J.; Ondei, S.; Brook, B. W.

2021-09-01 ecology
10.1101/2021.08.31.458457 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AimDespite the increasing interest in developing new bioregionalizations and assessing the most widely accepted biogeographic frameworks, no study to date has sought to systematically define a system of small bioregions nested within larger ones that better reflect the distribution and patterns of biodiversity. Here, we examine how an algorithmic, data-driven model of diversity patterns can lead to an ecologically interpretable hierarchy of bioregions. LocationAustralia. Time periodPresent. Major taxa studiedTerrestrial vertebrates and vascular plants. MethodsWe compiled information on the biophysical characteristics and species occupancy of Australias geographic conservation units (bioregions). Then, using cluster analysis to identify groupings of bioregions representing optimal discrete-species areas, we evaluated what a hierarchical bioregionalization system would look like when based empirically on the within-and between-site diversity patterns across taxa. Within an information-analytical framework, we then assessed the degree to which the World Wildlife Funds (WWF) biomes and ecoregions and our suite of discrete-species areas are spatially associated and compared those results among bioregionalization scenarios. ResultsInformation on biodiversity patterns captured was moderate for WWFs biomes (50- 58% for birds beta, and plants alpha and beta diversity, of optimal discrete areas, respectively) and ecoregions (additional 4-25%). Our plants and vertebrate optimal areas retained more information on alpha and beta diversity across taxa, with the two algorithmically derived biogeographic scenarios sharing 86.5% of their within- and between-site diversity information. Notably, discrete-species areas for beta diversity were parsimonious with respect to those for alpha diversity. Main conclusionsNested systems of bioregions must systematically account for the variation of species diversity across taxa if biodiversity research and conservation action are to be most effective across multiple spatial or temporal planning scales. By demonstrating an algorithmic rather than subjective method for defining bioregionalizations using species-diversity concordances, which reliably reflects the distributional patterns of multiple taxa, this work offers a valuable new tool for systematic conservation planning.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
2
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.9%
5
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
6
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
8
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
10
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
11
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
12
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
13
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
14
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
15
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
16
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
17
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.2%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
22
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.6%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.6%