Genome sequencing as a first-line diagnostic test for hospitalized newborns
Bowling, K. M.; Thompson, M. L.; Finnila, C. R.; Hiatt, S. M.; Latner, D. R.; Amaral, M. D.; Lawlor, J. M. J.; East, K. M.; Cochran, M. E.; Greve, V.; Kelley, W. V.; Gray, D. E.; Felker, S. A.; Meddaugh, H.; Cannon, A.; Luedecke, A.; Jackson, K. E.; Hendon, L. G.; Janani, H. M.; Johnston, M.; Merin, L. A.; Deans, S. L.; Tuura, C.; Williams, H.; Laborde, K.; Neu, M. B.; Patrick-Esteve, J.; Hurst, A. C. E.; Kandasamy, J.; Carlo, W.; Brothers, K. B.; Kirmse, B. M.; Savich, R.; Superneau, D.; Spedale, S. B.; Knight, S. J.; Barsh, G. S.; Korf, B. R.; Cooper, G. M.
Show abstract
PurposeSouthSeq, a translational research study to perform genome sequencing (GS) for infants with symptoms suggestive of a genetic disorder, was conducted in NICUs in the Southeastern US. Recruitment targeted racial/ethnic minorities and rural, medically underserved areas that are historically under-represented in genomic medicine research. MethodsGS and analysis were performed for 367 newborns to detect disease-causal genetic variation concurrent with standard of care evaluation and testing. ResultsDefinitive diagnostic (DD) or likely diagnostic (LD) genetic findings were identified in 30% of newborns and 14% harbored an uncertain result. Only 39% of DD/LD findings were identified via concurrent standard of care suggesting that GS testing is better for obtaining early genetic diagnosis. We also identified phenotypes that correlate with the likelihood of receiving a DD/LD finding, such as craniofacial, ophthalmologic, auditory, skin, and hair abnormalities. We did not observe any differences in diagnostic rates between racial/ethnic groups. ConclusionWe describe one of the largest to-date GS cohorts of ill newborns, enriched for African American and rural patients. Our results demonstrate the utility of GS as it provides early in life detection of clinically relevant genetic variation not identified via current standard clinical testing, particularly for newborns exhibiting certain phenotypic features.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- IGenomic answers for children: Dynamic analyses of >1000 pediatric rare disease genomes 95%
- Assessment of the variant prioritisation strategy for genomic newborn screening in the Generation Study 95%
- Rare variants found in clinical gene panels illuminate the genetic and allelic architecture of orofacial clefting 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- 3-hour genome sequencing and targeted analysis to rapidly assess genetic risk 94%
- Genetic Diagnosis of Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy Type 1 Using Rare Variant Linkage Analysis and Long Read Genome Sequencing 93%
- Detection and characterisation of copy number variants from exome sequencing in the DDD study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exome copy number variant detection, analysis and classification in a large cohort of families with undiagnosed rare genetic disease 95%
- Genome Sequencing and Comprehensive Rare Variant Analysis of 465 Families with Neurodevelopmental Disorders 95%
- Returning Actionable Genomic Results in a Research Biobank: Analytic Validity, Clinical Implementation and Resource Utilization 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-read genome sequencing for the diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders 94%
- Identification and validation of novel candidate risk genes in endocytic vesicular trafficking associated with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistulas 94%
- Whole Genome Sequencing for the Diagnosis of Rare Disorders 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.