Back

Air-nanobubbles ineffective to reduce pathogenic bacteria in fresh and brackish waters

Domingos, J. A.; Huang, Q.; Liu, H.; Dong, H. T.; Khongcharoen, N.; Van, P. T.; Nghia, N. H.; Giang, P. T.; The Viet, P.; St-Hilaire, S.

2021-08-27 microbiology
10.1101/2021.08.27.457885 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Nanobubble (NB) technology has been hailed as a novel way to disinfect water. Previous studies suggested that when NBs collapse, they create shock waves that result in OH- free radicals, which can damage cells, including bacteria. In this study, we investigated, through a series of 11 experiments, the potential use of air nanobubbles (128 {+/-} 44 nm, mean {+/-} SD) to reduce the concentration of various pathogenic bacteria including Aeromonas hydrophila, A. veronii, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and Streptococcus agalactiae under controlled, tank-based laboratory conditions. Despite the high number of nanobubbles continuously added to a relatively small volume of water in experimental tanks (50-100 L), we did not observe a consistent or significant decrease in bacteria that would control disease outbreaks. Although most of the experiments were conducted in fresh water on A. hydrophila, results were consistent across fresh and brackish water experiments, Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, and a range of nanobubble concentrations. This study suggests air nanobubbles on their own are inadequate to significantly reduce high levels of pathogenic bacteria in water. We propose to explore other gases for improving the disinfection properties of this technology. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTAir nanobubbles did not sufficiently reduce the level of bacteria in laboratory experiments.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
ACS ES&T Water
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.0%
3
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
4
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
7
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
8
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
10
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
12
PLOS Water
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
13
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
14
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
15
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
16
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
17
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
18
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
19
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
20
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
FEMS Microbes
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%