Detection of Multiple Types of Cancer Driver Mutations Us-ing Targeted RNA Sequencing in NSCLC

Currently, DNA and RNA are used separately to capture different types of gene mutations. DNA is commonly used for the detection of SNVs, indels and CNVs; RNA is used for analysis of gene fusion and gene expression. To perform both DNA sequencing (DNA-seq) and RNA-seq, material is divided into two copies, and two different procedures are required for sequencing. Due to overconsumption of samples and experimental process complexity, it is necessary to create an experimental method capable of analyzing SNVs, indels, fusions and expression. We developed an RNA-based hybridization capture panel targeting actionable driver oncogenes in solid tumors and corresponding sample preparation and bioinformatics workflows. Analytical validation with an RNA standard reference containing 16 known fusion mutations and 6 SNV mutations demonstrated a detection specificity of 100.0% [95% CI 88.7%~100.0%] for SNVs and 100.0% [95% CI 95.4%~100.0%] for fusions. The targeted RNA panel achieved a 0.73-2.63 copies/ng RNA lower limit of detection (LOD) for SNVs and 0.21-6.48 copies/ng RNA for fusions. Gene expression analysis revealed a correlation greater than 0.9 across all 15 cancer-related genes between the RNA-seq results and targeted RNA panel. Among 1253 NSCLC FFPE tumor samples, multiple mutation types were called from DNA- and RNA-seq data and compared between the two assays. The DNA panel detected 103 fusions and 21 METex14 skipping events; 124 fusions and 26 METex14 skipping events were detected by the target RNA panel; 21 fusions and 4 METex14 skipping events were only detected by the target RNA panel. Among the 173 NSCLC samples negative for targetable mutations by DNA-seq, 15 (15/173, 8.67%) showed targetable gene fusions that may change clinical decisions with RNA-seq. In total, 226 tier I and tier II missense variants for NSCLC were analyzed at genomic (DNA-seq) and transcriptomic (RNA-seq) levels. The positive percent agreement (PPA) was 97.8%, and the positive predictive value (PPV) was 98.6%. Interestingly, variant allele frequencies were generally higher at the RNA level than at the DNA level, suggesting relatively dominant expression of mutant alleles. PPA was 97.6% and PPV 99.38% for EGFR 19del and 20ins variants. We also explored the relationship of RNA expression with gene copy number and protein expression. The RPKM of EGFR transcripts assessed by the RNA panel showed a linear relationship with copy number quantified by the DNA panel, with an R of 0.8 in 1253 samples. In contrast, MET gene expression is regulated in a more complex manner. In IHC analysis, all 3+ samples exhibited higher RPKM levels; IHC level of 2+ and below showed lower RNA expression. Parallel DNA- and RNA-seq and systematic analysis demonstrated the accuracy and robustness of the RNA sequencing panel in identifying multiple types of variants for cancer therapy. Contact: zhaojia0327@126.com