Back

Facility-based HIV self-testing strategies may substantially increase number of men and youth tested for HIV in Malawi: results from a data-driven individual-based model

Nichols, B. E.; de Nooy, A.; Benade, M.; Balakasi, K.; Mphande, M.; Rao, G.; Claassen, C. W.; Khan, S.; Stillson, C.; Doi, N.; Dovel, K.

2021-08-27 hiv aids
10.1101/2021.08.25.21262593 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMalawi is rapidly closing the gap in achieving the UNAIDS 95-95-95 targets, with 90% of people living with HIV in Malawi aware of their status. As we approach epidemic control, interventions to improve coverage will become more costly. There is therefore an urgent need to identify innovative and low-cost strategies to maintain and increase testing coverage without diverting resources from other HIV services. MethodsA data-driven individual-based model was parameterized with data from a community-representative survey (sociodemographic, health service utilization, HIV testing history) of men and youth in Malawi (data collected 08/2019). 79 different strategies for the implementation of HIV self-testing (HIVST) and provider-initiated-testing-and-counselling at the outpatient department (OPD) were evaluated. Outcomes included percent of men/youth tested for HIV in a 12-month period, cost-effectiveness, and human resource requirements. Testing yield was assumed to be constant across the scenarios. FindingsFacility-based HIVST offered year-round resulted in the greatest increase in proportion of men and youth tested in the OPD (from 45% to 72%-83%), was considered cost-saving for HIVST kit priced at $1.00, and generally reduced required personnel as compared to the status quo. At higher HIVST kit prices, and more relaxed eligibility criteria, all scenarios that considered year-round HIVST in the OPD remained on the cost-effectiveness frontier. InterpretationFacility-based HIVST is a cost-effective strategy to increase the proportion of men/youth tested for HIV and decreases the human resource requirements for HIV testing in the OPD-providing additional health care worker time for other priority health care activities. FundingFCDO; USAID

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
3
AIDS
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
6
Journal of the International AIDS Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.3%
8
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
9
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
10
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
11
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
12
AIDS and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
16
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
19
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
21
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%