Back

Attitudes to health promotion among teaching staff in South West England: a qualitative study

Currie, J.

2021-08-27 public and global health
10.1101/2021.08.25.21262589 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundYoung people spend much of their formative years in education, making schools appealing environments for health promotion. The World Health Organisations Health Promoting Schools framework has been proposed as a useful model. We sought to explore secondary school teachers experiences of implementing this model and their attitudes to health promotion. ObjectivesTo explore teachers experiences and perceptions of health promotion and compare practice with the HPS framework for school health. DesignQualitative study with semi-structured interviews SettingNine state comprehensive schools in Bristol and surrounding areas. Participants25 teaching staff from school senior leadership teams, those working in health education and other subject teachers. AnalysisThematic analysis using NVivo 10. ResultsTeachers largely described educational approaches with less emphasis on school ethos or environment. Staff supported a role for schools in promoting health but felt restrained by limited family engagement, contradictory school practices, resource constraints and conflicting government policies. ConclusionsFuture reforms should ensure health is mainstreamed across school strategies, if we are to create the conditions that promote future generations health. Public health must build alliances with educationalists to support the priority-setting of health in school inspections, policy and practice. Strengths and limitations of the studyO_LIIn-depth exploration with teachers from different schools, levels of seniority and with varying experience of health promotion C_LIO_LIPurposive sampling to ensure representation from schools of different geography, Ofsted rating and proportions of students from disadvantaged backgrounds C_LIO_LIPossibility that schools with greater enthusiasm for health promotion disproportionately participated C_LIO_LITrend towards schools in more affluent areas participating C_LI

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.