Fire impacts tropical communities of soil fungi through changes to plant community composition, litter and soil chemistry
Calvert, J.; McTaggart, A.; Carvalhais, L. C.; Drenth, A.; Shivas, R.
Show abstract
Fire is predicted to be more severe and frequent in forests of the Australian Monsoon Tropics over the coming decades. The way in which groups of ecologically important soil fungi respond to disturbance caused by fire has not been studied in Australian tropical forest ecosystems. Ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungi are important tree symbionts and saprotrophic fungi drive soil nutrient cycles. We analysed both publicly-available environmental DNA sequence data as well as soil chemistry data to test a hypothesis that burned areas in a contiguous tropical forest have different community composition and diversity of EM and saprotrophic soil fungi relative to nearby unburned sites. We tested this hypothesis by measuring community-level taxonomic composition, fungal diversity, species richness and evenness. We determined whether changes in fungal communities were associated with fire-altered soil chemical/physical properties, vegetation types, or the direct effect of fire. Soil fungi differed in abundance and community phylogenetic structure between forest sites that had experienced fire, and sites dominated by unburned forest. EM community composition differed between unburned and burned sites, which had more mycorrhizal hosts including Corymbia intermedia, Acacia flavescens and Acacia midgleyi. Lower diversity of saprotrophic fungi was correlated with lower soil nutrient levels and different litter composition at burned sites. Pyrophilic, truffle-like EM fungi that rely on mycophagous mammals for dispersal were abundant at recently burned sites. We conclude that EM fungi show different patterns of diversity in burned tropical forest, likely driven by changing plant communities, whereas differences in saprotrophic fungal communities of burned sites may be driven by by reduced soil nutrient levels and altered litter composition. Graphical abstract O_FIG_DISPLAY_L [Figure 1] M_FIG_DISPLAY C_FIG_DISPLAY
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Response of soil microbial communities to mixed forests of European beech and conifers: Variations with site conditions 97%
- Resilience in soil bacterial communities of the boreal forest from one to five years after wildfire across a severity gradient 96%
- Soil Bacterial and Fungal Response to Wildfires in the Canadian Boreal Forest Across a Burn Severity Gradient 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prescribed versus wildfire impacts on exotic plants and soil microbes in California grasslands 98%
- Fungal Communities in Soybean Cyst Nematode-Infested Soil under Long Term Corn and Soybean Monoculture and Crop Rotation 94%
- Soil microaggregate bacterial communities following Amynthas tokioensis and Amynthas agrestis earthworm co-invasion 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Soil disturbance affects plant growth via soil microbial community shifts 96%
- Land-use and forest floor explain prokaryotic metacommunity structuring and spatial turnover in Amazonian forest-to-pasture conversion areas 96%
- Variation of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus content in fungi reflects their ecology and phylogeny 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tree species identity drives soil Carbon and Nitrogen stocks in nutrient-poor sites 95%
- Bark beetles as ecosystem engineers: triggered tree mortality rearranges the assemblage of Tree-related Microhabitats in old-growth coniferous forest 93%
- Use of massive DNA barcoding to monitor biodiversity: a test on forest soil macrofauna 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preferential associations of soil fungal taxa under mixed compositions of eastern American tree species 96%
- Aspen-associated soil microbiomes reveal different strategies for nitrogen acquisition across ecosystems in Mexico and Canada 96%
- Soil microbial composition varies in response to coffee agroecosystem management 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.