Unveiling the links between peptide identification and differential analysis FDR controls by means of a practical introduction to knockoff filters
Etourneau, L.; Varoquaux, N.; Burger, T.
Show abstract
In proteomic differential analysis, FDR control is often performed through a multiple test correction (i.e., the adjustment of the original p-values). In this protocol, we apply a recent and alternative method, based on so-called knockoff filters. It shares interesting conceptual similarities with the target-decoy competition procedure, classically used in proteomics for FDR control at peptide identification. To provide practitioners with a unified understanding of FDR control in proteomics, we apply the knockoff procedure on real and simulated quantitative datasets. Leveraging these comparisons, we propose to adapt the knockoff procedure to better fit the specificities of quantitive proteomic data (mainly very few samples). Performances of knockoff procedure are compared with those of the classical Benjamini-Hochberg procedure, hereby shedding a new light on the strengths and weaknesses of target-decoy competition.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- DAGBagM: Learning directed acyclic graphs of mixed variables with an application to identify prognostic protein biomarkers in ovarian cancer 94%
- A comparative study of topology-based pathway enrichment analysis methods 94%
- SPECS: A non-parameteric method to identify tissue-specific molecular features for unbalanced sample groups 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reconstruction Set Test (RESET): a computationally efficient method for single sample gene set testing based on randomized reduced rank reconstruction error 95%
- STREAK: A Supervised Cell Surface Receptor Abundance Estimation Strategy for Single Cell RNA-Sequencing Data using Feature Selection and Thresholded Gene Set Scoring 94%
- Generating Correlated Data for Omics Simulation 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.