Back

Multi view based imaging genetics analysis on Parkinson disease

Cerri, G.; Tognon, M.; Avesani, S.; Oxtoby, N.; Altmann, A.; Giugno, R.

2021-08-19 bioinformatics
10.1101/2021.08.19.456943 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Longitudinal studies integrating imaging and genetic data have recently become widespread among bioinformatics researchers. Combining such heterogeneous data allows a better understanding of complex diseases origins and causes. Through a multi-view based workflow proposal, we show the common steps and tools used in imaging genetics analysis, interpolating genotyping, neuroimaging and transcriptomic data. We describe the advantages of existing methods to analyze heterogeneous datasets, using Parkinsons Disease (PD) as a case study. Parkinsons disease is associated with both genetic and neuroimaging factors, however such imaging genetics associations are at an early investigation stage. Therefore it is desirable to have a free and open source workflow that integrates different analysis flows in order to recover potential genetic biomarkers in PD, as in other complex diseases.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.2%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
6.9%
Similar papers in this journal
3
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.4%
Similar papers in this journal
4
NeuroImage: Clinical
○ 144 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.6%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Briefings in Bioinformatics
◐ 354 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
Similar papers in this journal
6
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
7
Genes
○ 144 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.9%
8
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
○ 22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
○ 494 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.5%
10
Human Brain Mapping
○ 329 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
11
Computers in Biology and Medicine
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
12
Sensors
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
13
npj Parkinson's Disease
○ 105 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
14
Neuroinformatics
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
● 242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
○ 77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Genetics
○ 230 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Scientific Data
○ 209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
○ 41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
21
BMC Genomics
○ 406 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
22
Biology Methods and Protocols
◐ 61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
● 37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
24
Frontiers in Neuroscience
○ 256 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
25
Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
26
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
○ 50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
27
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
28
Brain Communications
◐ 166 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
29
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
30
Gigabyte
● 62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.