Back

Predicting SARS-CoV-2 infections for children and youth with single symptom screening

Webster, R. J.; Reddy, D.; Harrison, M.-A.; Farion, K. J.; Willmore, J.; Foote, M.; Thampi, N.

2021-08-23 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.08.19.21262310
Show abstract

Symptom-based SARS-CoV-2 screening and testing decisions in children have important implications on daycare and school exclusion policies. Single symptoms account for a substantial volume of testing and disruption to in-person learning and childcare, yet their predictive value is unclear, given the clinical overlap with other circulating respiratory viruses and non-infectious etiologies. We aimed to determine the relative frequency and predictive value of single symptoms for paediatric SARS-CoV-2 infections from an Ottawa COVID-19 assessment centre from October 2020 through April 2021. Overall, 46.3% (n=10,688) of pediatric encounters were for single symptoms, and 2.7% of these tested positive. The most common presenting single symptoms were rhinorrhea (31.8%), cough (17.4%) and fever (14.0%). Among children with high-risk exposures children in each age group, the following single symptoms had a higher proportion of positive SARS-CoV-2 cases compared to no symptoms; fever and fatigue (0-4 years); fever, cough, headache, and rhinorrhea (5-12 years); fever, loss of taste or smell, headache, rhinorrhea, sore throat, and cough (13-17 years). There was no evidence that the single symptom of either rhinorrhea or cough predicted SARS-CoV-2 infections among 0-4 year olds, despite accounting for a large volume (61.1%) of single symptom presentations in the absence of high-risk exposures. Symptom-based screening needs to be responsive to changes in evidence and local factors, including the expected resurgence of other respiratory viruses following relaxation of social distancing/masking, to reduce infection-related risks in schools and daycare settings.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 3%
7.6%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 6%
7.6%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 57%
7.6%
4
JAMA Pediatrics
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
7.6%
5
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 15%
7.6%
6
BMJ
based on 49 papers
Top 0.8%
5.1%
7
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 1%
3.0%
8
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
based on 124 papers
Top 3%
2.8%
9
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 6%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 25%
2.5%
11
Eurosurveillance
based on 77 papers
Top 3%
2.3%
12
Vaccine
based on 140 papers
Top 3%
2.3%
13
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 137 papers
Top 6%
1.6%
14
Frontiers in Pediatrics
based on 24 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
15
eClinicalMedicine
based on 55 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
16
BMJ Paediatrics Open
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 77%
1.3%
18
CMAJ Open
based on 12 papers
Top 0.6%
1.2%
19
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
based on 57 papers
Top 7%
0.8%
20
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
based on 20 papers
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
Emerging Infectious Diseases
based on 84 papers
Top 11%
0.8%
22
European Respiratory Journal
based on 44 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
based on 36 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
24
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 17%
0.8%
25
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 21%
0.8%
26
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
based on 16 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
27
The Lancet
based on 16 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Annals of Internal Medicine
based on 27 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
29
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 21%
0.7%