CureSCi Metadata Catalog - Making sickle cell studies findable
Pan, H.; Ives, C.; Mandal, M.; Qin, Y.; Hendershot, T.; Brambilla, D.; Treadwell, M.; Wu, X.; Popovic, J.; Stratford, J.; Kroner, B.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo adopt the FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) to enhance data sharing, the Cure Sickle Cell Initiative (CureSCi) MetaData Catalog (MDC) was developed to make Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) study datasets more Findable by curating study metadata and making them available through an open-access web portal. MethodsStudy metadata, including study protocol, data collection forms, and data dictionaries, describe information about study patient-level data. We curated key metadata of 16 SCD studies in a three-tiered conceptual framework of category, subcategory, and data element using ontologies and controlled vocabularies to organize the study variables. We developed the CureSCi MDC by indexing study metadata to enable effective browse and search capabilities at three levels: study, Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures, and data element levels. ResultsThe CureSCi MDC offers several browse and search tools to discover studies by study level, PRO Measures, and data elements. The "Browse Studies," "Browse Studies by PRO Measures," and "Browse Studies by Data Elements" tools allow users to identify studies through pre-defined conceptual categories. "Search by Keyword" and "Search Data Element by Concept Category" can be used separately or in combination to provide more granularity to refine the search results. This resource helps investigators find information about specific data elements across studies using public browsing/search tools, before going through data request procedures to access controlled datasets. The MDC makes SCD studies more Findable through browsing/searching study information, PRO Measures, and data elements, aiding in the reuse of existing SCD data.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical code sets and the problem of redundancy in code set repositories 93%
- Study protocol for the Innovative Support for Patients with SARS-COV-2 Infections Registry (INSPIRE): a longitudinal study of the medium and long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection 93%
- CohortDiagnostics: phenotype evaluation across a network of observational data sources using population-level characterization 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Decision support system to evaluate VENTilation in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (DeVENT study) – Trial Protocol 92%
- Moderate-Intensity Exercise Versus High-Intensity Interval Training to Recover Walking Post-Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 91%
- The effect of osteotomy technique (flat-cut vs wedge-cut Weil) on pain relief and complication incidence following surgical treatment for patients presenting with metatarsalgia in a private metropolitan clinic: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Increasing Trust in Real-World Evidence Through Evaluation of Observational Data Quality 93%
- Development and Validation of Phenotype Classifiers across Multiple Sites in the Observational Health Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) Network 92%
- Large Language Models Facilitate the Generation of Electronic Health Record Phenotyping Algorithms 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.