Back

Relevance of Auditory Errors Decreases When Errors Are Introduced Suddenly

Chao, S.-C.; Daliri, A.

2021-08-10 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.08.09.455646 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeWhen the speech motor system encounters errors, it generates adaptive responses to compensate for the errors. We previously showed that adaptive responses to task-irrelevant errors are significantly smaller than responses to task-relevant errors when errors are introduced gradually. The current study aimed to examine responses to task-irrelevant and task-relevant errors when errors are introduced suddenly. MethodWe used an adaptation paradigm in which participants experienced task-relevant errors (induced by formant-shift perturbations) and task-irrelevant errors (induced by formant-clamp perturbations). For one group of participants (N = 30), we applied the perturbations gradually. The second group of participants (N = 30) received the perturbations suddenly. We designed the perturbations based on participant-specific vowel configurations such that a participants first and second formants of /{varepsilon}/ were perturbed toward their /ae/. To estimate adaptive responses, we measured formant changes (within 0-100 ms of the vowel onset) in response to the formant perturbations. ResultsWe found that (1) the difference between adaptive responses to formant-shift and formant-clamp perturbations was the smallest for the suddenly introduced perturbations, and (2) responses to formant-shift perturbations positively correlated with responses to formant-clamp perturbations for the suddenly (but not gradually) introduced perturbations. ConclusionsThese results showed that the speech motor system responds to task-relevant errors and task-irrelevant errors more differently when errors are introduced gradually than suddenly. Overall, the speech motor system evaluates the relevance of errors and uses its evaluation to modulate its adaptive responses to errors.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.4%
2
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.3%
3
Trends in Hearing
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
6
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
7
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
8
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
9
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
14
Behavior Research Methods
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
15
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
16
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
24
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Neuroscience Research
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.5%