Ongoing mitigation strategies and further needs of the United States food industry to control COVID-19 in the work environment
Llanos-Soto, S.; Bulut, E.; Murphy, S. I.; Henry, C. J.; Zoellner, C.; Wiedmann, M.; Wetherington, D.; Adalja, A.; Alcaine, S. D.; Ivanek, R.
Show abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has had dire effects on the United States (US) food industry through impacts on workers health and wellbeing and supply chain disruptions. The objectives of this study were to determine what the food industry needs to be able to control COVID-19 impacts in the work environment and what mitigation strategies are being implemented. A web-based needs assessment survey was distributed from January to April 2021, via 13 food professional/trade organizations and 2 social networks, targeting management professionals at food (produce, dairy, poultry, and beef/pork) processing facilities and produce farm operations in the US. Statistical analyses evaluated patterns in self-reported adoption of mitigation strategies against COVID-19 in the participants facilities/operations and perceived needs of the industry regarding COVID-Responses to open-ended questions were analyzed using thematic analysis. In total 145 responses were received, of which 79 were usable, including 38 (48%) from the dairy, 17 (22%) from the fresh produce, and 24 (30%) from a mixture of other food industry sectors. Only two usable responses were from the beef/pork sector and none from the poultry sector. Findings revealed that several social distancing, biosecurity, and surveillance mitigation strategies against COVID-19 are commonly implemented in the participants facilities/operations, but their implementation frequency differs by the facility/operation size and industry sector. Also, findings indicated that collaboration between the food industry and government agencies, contingency plans and appropriate training, and new technologies are needed to control COVID- 19 in the food industry. Subject to limitations associated with the relatively low response rate (possible selection bias), the findings suggest that the US food industry is prepared to safeguard workers health and businesses in the event of a new COVID-19 variant or similar future disaster, provided that appropriate structures are put in place to ensure coordination and compliance, both before and during such an outbreak.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of a systems engineering framework to assess perceptions and practices about antimicrobial resistance of workers on large dairy farms in Wisconsin 94%
- How do dairy farmers wish their future farm? 94%
- Implementation and enforcement of mandatory calorie labelling regulations for the out-of-home sector in England: qualitative study of the experiences of business implementers and regulatory enforcers 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- “Climate change and health?”: Knowledge and perceptions among key stakeholders in Puducherry, India 92%
- COVID-19 Pandemic among Latinx Farmworker and Non-farmworker Families in North Carolina: Knowledge, Risk Perceptions, and Preventive Behaviors 92%
- Experience of the COVID-19 pandemic in rural Odisha, India: knowledge, preventative actions, and impacts on daily life 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The development and validation of a survey to measure fecal-oral child exposure to zoonotic enteropathogens: The FECEZ Enteropathogens Index 93%
- Who participates in ‘participatory design’ of WASH infrastructure: a mixed-methods process evaluation 92%
- Urban pandemic response: survey results describing the experiences from twenty-five cities during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparative national-level analysis of government food system resilience activities in preparation for future food system disruptions 94%
- Home Food Procurement Impacts Food Security and Diet Quality during COVID-19 93%
- A mixed methods study evaluating food insecurity and diet quality in households accessing food aid in England 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.