The relationships between structural organization, material properties, and loading conditions and the risk of fracture and fracture location in the femur
Bredbenner, T. L.
Show abstract
Increased risk of skeletal fractures due to bone mass loss is a major public health problem resulting in significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in the case of hip fractures. Current clinical methods based on two-dimensional measures of bone mineral density (areal BMD or aBMD) are often unable to identify individuals at risk of fracture. The underlying hypothesis of this study was that combinations of femur structural traits are different for those femurs that suffer a fragility fracture within the proximal region of the femur and those that sustain a fracture in either the subtrochanteric or midshaft region of the femur, resulting in an "atypical femur fracture". Accordingly, the objective of this study was to determine the effects of varying combinations of structural traits, material properties, and loading conditions on femur stress response and the location of stress response variation using a validated parametric finite element model. Statistical shape and trait modelling of the femur was used to describe variability in the structural organization of a set of femurs in an efficient manner and the resulting description of structural variability was exploited to investigate how different mechanisms of fracture might occur, whether in the proximal region or in the subtrochanteric and midshaft region. In combination with parameters describing loading condition and material property variation, variation in structural organization is associated with regional increases in maximum principal stress and the percentage of bone expected to damage, and these increases are likely associated with increased fracture risk. The results of this study indicate that there are multiple pathways and combinations of descriptor variation that may result in increased fracture risk and that these pathways can lead to fracture in any region of the femur under both overload conditions, such as with sideways fall loading, and stance loading, which due to the repetitive nature may lead to the accumulation of fatigue damage within the bone and further impair bone condition and increased susceptibility to fracture.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of the mandibular curve of Spee and maxillary compensating curve: A finite element model 95%
- Lateral pressure equalisation as a principle for designing support surfaces to prevent deep tissue pressure ulcers 94%
- Tissue-specific changes in size and shape of the ligaments and tendons of the porcine knee during post-natal growth 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Effect of Celecoxib and muMab911 on Strain Adaptive Bone Remodeling and Fracture Repair in Female Mice: Implications for Rapidly Progressive Osteoarthritis 95%
- Automated Segmentation of Fractured Distal Radii by 3D Geodesic Active Contouring of in vivo HR-pQCT Images 95%
- Large-scale osteocyte lacunar morphological analysis of transiliac bone in normal and osteoporotic premenopausal women 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of two different finite element modeling pipelines for virtual mechanical testing of the distal third metacarpal bone in Thoroughbred racehorses 95%
- Acute repair of meniscus root tear partially restores joint displacements as measured with MRI and loading in a porcine knee 95%
- Stroke prevents exercise-induced gains in bone microstructure but not composition in mice 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Simulating human foot mechanics during walking based on an anatomically detailed forward dynamic finite element model 95%
- Muscle Moment Arm-Joint Angle Relations in the Hip, Knee, and Ankle: A Visualization of Datasets 92%
- Fully Implanted Prostheses for Musculoskeletal Limb Reconstruction after Amputation: An In Vivo Feasibility Study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.