Back

Evaluating Differences in Elastic Modulus of Regenerated and Uninjured Mouse Digit Bone through microCT Density-Elasticity Calculation and Nanoindentation Testing

Hoffseth, K. F.; Busse, E.; Lacey, M.; Sammarco, M. C.

2021-07-26 bioengineering
10.1101/2021.07.26.453818 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bone is an essential, healing structure in vertebrates that ensures daily function. However, the regenerative capacity of bone declines with age, compromising quality of life in the elderly and increasing cost of care. Here, for the first time, the elasticity of regenerated bone in a mouse digit amputation model is evaluated in order to better investigate biomechanics of skeletal regeneration. Amputation of the distal one third of the digit (third phalangeal element - P3) results in de novo regeneration of the digit, where analyzing the structural quality of this regenerated bone is a challenging task due to its small scale and triangular shape. To date, the evaluation of structural quality of the P3 bone has primarily focused on mineral density and bone architecture. This work describes an image-processing based method for assessment of elasticity in the whole P3 bone by using microcomputed tomography-generated mineral density data to calculate spatially discrete elastic modulus values across the entire P3 bone volume. Further, we validate this method through comparison to nanoindentation-measured values for elastic modulus. Application to a set of regenerated and unamputated digits shows that regenerated bone has a lower elastic modulus compared to the uninjured digit, with a similar trend for experimental hardness values. This method will be impactful in predicting and evaluating the regenerative outcomes of potential treatments and heightens the utility of the P3 regenerative model.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
2
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
6
Bone
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
7
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
8
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
9
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
10
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
11
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
12
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
16
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
17
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
18
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
20
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
21
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
JBMR Plus
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
npj Microgravity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%