Machine Learning Applied to Routine Blood Tests and Clinical Metadata to Identify and Classify Heart failure
James, N.; Gerrish, L.; Rokotyan, N.; Gladding, P. A.
Show abstract
IntroductionWe applied machine learning (ML) to routine bloods, then to advanced haematology data from a full blood count (rawFBC) plus biochemistry, to build predictive models for heart failure, which were then used at population scale. MethodsRoutine blood results from 8,031 patients with heart failure, with equal number of controls, were used in ML training and testing datasets (Split 80:20). NT-proBNP was used for diagnostic comparison. rawFBC metadata was used in a dataset of 698 patients, 314 of whom had heart failure, to train and test ML models (Split 70:30) from rawFBC, rawFBC plus biochemistry and routine bloods. The rawFBC model was used to predict heart failure in a validation dataset of 69,492 FBCs (2.3% heart failure prevalence). ResultsHeart failure was predicted from rawFBC and biochemistry versus rawFBC AUROC 0.93 versus 0.91, 95% CI -0.023 to 0.048, P = 0.5, and predicted from routine bloods and NT-proBNP, AUROC 0.87 versus 0.81, 95% CI 0.004 to 0.097, P = 0.03. In the validation cohort heart failure was predicted from rawFBC with AUROC 0.83, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.84, P < 0.001, sensitivity 75%, specificity 76%, PPV 7%, NPV 99.2% (Figure 2). Elevated NT-proBNP ([≥] 34 pmol/L) was predicted from rawFBC with AUROC 0.97, 95% CI 0.93 to 0.99, P < 0.0001. Common predictive features included markers of erythropoiesis (red cell distribution width, haemoglobin, haematocrit). O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=170 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/21261115v1_fig2.gif" ALT="Figure 2"> View larger version (30K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6f84e2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@17d4805org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@360d3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c9da66_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 2.C_FLOATNO Receiver operator curves comparing ECLIPSE models C_FIG ConclusionHeart failure can be predicted from routine bloods with accuracy equivalent to NT-proBNP. Predictive features included markers of erythropoiesis, with therapeutic monitoring implications.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting 30-Day and 1-Year Mortality in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) 95%
- ChatGPT Provides Inconsistent Risk-Stratification of Patients With Atraumatic Chest Pain 94%
- Translation of Immunomodulatory Therapy to Treat Chronic Heart Failure: Preclinical Studies to First in Human 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vascular Comorbidities Worsen Prognosis of Patients with Heart Failure Hospitalized with COVID-19 92%
- Machine learning approaches to predict 30-day mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention in an Australian population 92%
- Multispecialty multidisciplinary input into comorbidities in heart failure reduces hospitalisation and clinic attendance 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- An International Longitudinal Natural History Study of Danon Disease Patients: Unique Cardiac Trajectories Identified Based on Sex and Heart Failure Outcomes 93%
- Non-Invasive Scale Measurement of Cardiac Output Compared with the Gold-Standard Direct Fick Method: A Feasibility Study 93%
- iCPET calculator: a web-based application to standardize the calculation of alpha distensibility in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of a Continuous Single Lead Electrocardiogram Analytic to Predict Patient Deterioration Requiring Rapid Response Team Activation 93%
- Detecting QT prolongation From a Single-lead ECG With Deep Learning 92%
- QRS detection in single-lead, telehealth electrocardiogram signals: benchmarking open-source algorithms 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.