Performance of Deep Convolutional Neural Network Approaches and Human Level in Detecting Mosquito Species
Jomtarak, R.; Kittichai, V.; Pengsakul, T.; Phatthamolrat, N.; Naing, K. M.; Tongloy, T.; Chuwongin, S.; Boonsang, S.
Show abstract
Recently, mosquito-borne diseases have been a significant problem for public health worldwide. These diseases include dengue, ZIKA and malaria. Reducing disease spread stimulates researchers to develop automatic methods beyond traditional surveillance Well-known Deep Convolutional Neural Network, YOLO v3 algorithm, was applied to classify mosquito vector species and showed a high average accuracy of 97.7 per cent. While one-stage learning methods have provided impressive output in Aedes albopictus, Anopheles sinensis and Culex pipiens, the use of image annotation functions may help boost model capability in the identification of other low-sensitivity (< 60 per cent) mosquito images for Cu. tritaeniorhynchus and low-precision Ae. vexans (< 80 per cent). The optimal condition of the data increase (rotation, contrast and blurredness and Gaussian noise) was investigated within the limited amount of biological samples to increase the selected model efficiency. As a result, it produced a higher potential of 96.6 percent for sensitivity, 99.6 percent for specificity, 99.1 percent for accuracy, and 98.1 percent for precision. The ROC Curve Area (AUC) endorsed the ability of the model to differentiate between groups at a value of 0.985. Inter-and intra-rater heterogeneity between ground realities (entomological labeling) with the highest model was studied and compared to research by other independent entomologists. A substantial degree of near-perfect compatibility between the ground truth label and the proposed model (k = 0.950 {+/-} 0.035) was examined in both examinations. In comparison, a high degree of consensus was assessed for entomologists with greater experience than 5-10 years (k = 0.875 {+/-} 0.053 and 0.900 {+/-} 0.048). The proposed YOLO v3 network algorithm has the largest capacity for support-devices used by entomological technicians during local area detection. In the future, introducing the appropriate network model based methods to find qualitative and quantitative information will help to make local workers work quicker. It may also assist in the preparation of strategies to help deter the transmission of arthropod-transmitted diseases.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An Autoencoder and Artificial Neural Network-based Method to Estimate Parity Status of Wild Mosquitoes from Near-infrared Spectra 96%
- Utilizing CNNs for classification and uncertainty quantification for 15 families of European fly pollinators 96%
- A Machine Learning Model of Microscopic Agglutination Test for Diagnosis of Leptospirosis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-time feeding behavior monitoring by electrical penetration graph rapidly reveals host plant susceptibility to crapemyrtle bark scale (Hemiptera: Eriococcidae) 93%
- Meta-analysis of transcriptomes in insects showing density-dependent polyphenism 92%
- Evaluation of rearing parameters of a self-limiting strain of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Forecasting invasive mosquito abundance in the Basque Country, Spain using machine learning techniques 96%
- An assessment of adult mosquito collection techniques for studying species abundance and diversity in Maferinyah, Guinea 94%
- Household-Level Risk Factors for Aedes aegypti Pupal Density in Guayaquil, Ecuador 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population dynamics of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in a semirural area under subtropical monsoon climate of Bangladesh 94%
- A hybrid CNN-Random Forest algorithm for bacterial spore segmentation and classification in TEM images 94%
- Estimation of Three-Dimensional Chromatin Morphology for Nuclear Classification and Characterisation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.