Back

Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of Fusarium circinatum-Responsive lncRNAs in Pinus radiata

Zamora-Ballesteros, C.; Martin-Garcia, J.; Suarez-Vega, A.; Diez, J.

2021-07-21 plant biology
10.1101/2021.07.21.453138 bioRxiv
Show abstract

One of the most promising strategies of Pine Pitch Canker (PPC) management is the use of reproductive plant material resistant to the disease. Understanding the complexity of plant transcriptome that underlies the defence to the causal agent Fusarium circinatum, would greatly facilitate the development of an accurate breeding program. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are emerging as important transcriptional regulators under biotic stresses in plants. However, to date, characterization of lncRNAs in conifer trees has not been reported. In this study, transcriptomic identification of lncRNAs was carried out using strand-specific paired-end RNA sequencing, from Pinus radiata samples inoculated with F. circinatum at an early stage of infection. Overall, 13,312 lncRNAs were predicted through a bioinformatics approach, including long intergenic non-coding RNAs (92.3%), antisense lncRNAs (3.3%) and intronic lncRNAs (2.9%). Compared with protein-coding RNAs, pine lncRNAs are shorter, have lower expression, lower GC content and harbour fewer and shorter exons. A total of 164 differentially expressed (DE) lncRNAs were identified in response to F. circinatum infection in the inoculated versus mock-inoculated P. radiata seedlings. The predicted cis-regulated target genes of these pathogen-responsive lncRNAs were related to defence mechanisms such as kinase activity, phytohormone regulation, and cell wall reinforcement. Co-expression network analysis of DE lncRNAs, DE protein-coding RNAs and lncRNA target genes also indicated a potential network regulating pectinesterase activity and cell wall remodelling. This study presents the first analysis of conifer lncRNAs involved in the regulation of defence network and provides the basis for future functional characterizations of lncRNAs in relation to pine defence responses against F. circinatum.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.6%
2
Plant Molecular Biology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.5%
3
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.0%
4
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.5%
5
Plant Cell Reports
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.0%
6
Physiologia Plantarum
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.7%
8
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
9
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
10
Planta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
12
Horticulture Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
13
Plant and Cell Physiology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.3%
18
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Plant Science
31 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
20
The Plant Genome
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
21
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Environmental and Experimental Botany
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
23
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
24
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
25
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
26
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.0%
27
Plant Biotechnology Journal
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
28
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
29
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%