Australia's worsening mental health - what's next?
Enticott, J.; Dawadi, S.; Shawyer, F.; Inder, B.; Fossey, E.; Teede, H.; Rosenberg, S.; Ozol, I.; Meadows, G.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo examine trends in psychological distress in Australia between 2001 to 2017-18, including analysis by age, sex, and location. Design, setting and participantsSecondary analysis of six successive national health surveys of representative samples of the working age population (18-64 years). Main outcome measuresPrevalence of psychological distress at very-high symptom level (defined by a Kessler Psychological Distress Scale [K10] score of 30 or more) and combined high/very-high level (K10 score of 22 or more). ResultsThe latest survey showed 5.1% of Australians reporting very-high level distress and 14.8% combined high/very-high level - both the largest rates recorded this century. The greatest increase from 2001 to 2017-18 was in women aged 55-64 with very-high distress significantly increasing from 3.5% (95% CI: 2.5-4.5%) to 7.2% (5.9-8.5%), and; high/very-high distress from 12.4% (10.5-14.2%) to 18.7% (16.7-20.7%). Men aged 25-34 had very-high distress increase from 2.1% (1.4-2.8) to 4.0% (2.9-5.1%); and combined high/very-high distress remained stable at 10.6% (9.1-12.1%) to 11.5% (9.7-13.3%). In 2017-18, greatest distress was in women aged 18-24 years (very-high 8.0% (5.9-10.2%); high/very-high 22.1% (18.8-25.3%)). Overall, distress was significantly more prevalent in inner regional Australia than elsewhere (very-high level 4.8% (4.4-5.1%); high/very-high 14.4% (13.8-15%)). ConclusionsAustralias annual mental health expenditure over this period has doubled, yet population level psychological distress has increased. A whole of government approach and targeted strategies focusing on groups with the poorest mental health such as older working aged women, younger people, particularly women, and those outside of major cities are indicated. Box"The known" Previous examinations of national health surveys had suggested that population mental health was stable as measured by psychological distress. "The new" Examining six consecutive national surveys we provide evidence that mental health has significantly deteriorated between 2001 and 2018. The latest survey showed 5.1% of Australians reporting very-high distress and 14.8% combined high/very-high distress, which are the largest rates reported this century. "The implications" Whole of government approach and targeted strategies focusing on groups with the poorest mental health such as older working aged women, younger people particularly women, and those outside of major cities are indicated.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychosocial factors associated with mental health and quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic among low-income urban dwellers in Peninsular Malaysia 95%
- The health impacts of a 4-month long community-wide COVID-19 lockdown: Findings from a prospective longitudinal study in the state of Victoria, Australia 95%
- Loneliness among people with severe mental ill health during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from a linked UK population cohort study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: a two-wave cohort study 96%
- Machine Learning for Prediction of Childhood Mental Health Problems in Social Care 94%
- The prevalence, incidence, prognosis and risk factors for depression and anxiety in a UK cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychological, social and financial impact of COVID-19 on culturally and linguistically diverse communities: a cross-sectional Australian study 96%
- “When will this end? Will it end?” The impact of the March-June 2020 UK Covid-19 lockdown response on mental health: a longitudinal survey of mothers in the Born in Bradford study 94%
- Improving our understanding of the social determinants of mental health: A data linkage study of mental health records and the 2011 UK census 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal trends and risk factors for depressed mood among Canadian adults during the first wave of COVID-19 94%
- Business as Un-usual: Access to mental health and primary care services for people with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 restrictions 93%
- Mental Health Impact of COVID-19: A global study of risk and resilience factors 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Loneliness and the onset of new mental health problems in the general population: a systematic review 94%
- Social inequalities in youth mental health in Canada, 2007-2022: a population-based repeated cross-sectional study 94%
- What has changed in the experiences of people with mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic? Findings from follow-up interviews using a coproduced, participatory qualitative approach 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.